From Holland: "The World Is About to Change"

Q Is Not A Conspiracy. Q Is Not A Theory. Ergo, Q Is Not A Conspiracy Theory

Call Q a fraud.

Call Q a fake.

Call Q a Psyop.

Call Q a LARP (Live Action Role Play if prefer excessive verbiage to describe a fake.)

But Q is NOT a conspiracy theory. Words have meaning. The JFK assassination explained by someone not associated with The Warren Report is a conspiracy theory. "It was not a lone gunman but a coordinated effort by many and I submit as evidence...''

The media handling of Q is reminiscent of the caged apes who were taught sign language. I think it was Koko who had but one word for anything aversive: Crocodile.

To Koko, something that tasted bad was crocodile. Our news media uses two words where Koko used one. You might take the brevity is the soul of wit defense but I will defend our esteemed fourth estate for their double-sized vocabulary.

 Why do they hammer out terms like conspiracy theory to describe something that is neither? Are they gaslighting me again? Are they just trying to vex me with their baby talk? Are they trying to hamper civil discourse with their foolishness? I say therein lies a conspiracy. That's my theory

Will Tomorrow Be The Most Historically-Significant Day Since 9/11?

From multiple sources, we hear that 6/11 will be a glorious day.

 6/12 will also be big due to Trump's meeting with the North Koreans.

 6/14 will be big due to the release of the long-awaited OIG report (moved back at  Horowitz's insistence so as to be a birthday present for POTUS?)

Something big is supposedly scheduled for Monday. Actually, multiple events are predicted.

Julian Assange is expected to show his Aces but he has let us down before.

Sessions is predicted to play a part in the festivities. A testimonial to our corrupt times is that scandals are so numerous that impending DOJ action does not tell us anything. Spygate? Leakgate? Tarmac? The server? Huma? Awans? Seth Rich? 30k sealed indictments? Uranium One? Weiner's laptop? We could exclude all of these things and still witness a tsunami.

Those of us who have been told to trust the plan, have been sedated by Q Anon, Meganon, Eye the Spy, et al, but the meds are wearing off. We waited long enough. This week is supposed to be big, starting with bombshells on Monday. Let us hope the fireworks do not fizzle.

EyeTheSpy
‏


 @EyeTheSpy

Understand, The World is Watching Not Here, but the Events in Singapore Nothing like this has ever happened in known history It is an Enigma to The World What will happen will shock Everyone Imagine you know nothing of Q This is the World's view ------- Enjoy The Show Fam

9:25 PM - 9 Jun 2018

Sessions And Me

I was beyond disgust and frustration with Jeff Sessions' inaction. Last fall I started a Care2 petition to remove Jeff Sessions. A friend of mine, who happens to believe in the primacy of Facebook, identified a dozen or so pro-Trump FB groups to join. I joined with the express purpose of recruiting signers to my petition. To date, I have collected 22 signatures for my efforts. I probably could have achieved the double deuces without Zuckerberg's assistance.

About a month after launching the petition, I discover Q Anon, and I developed a cultish obsession with all things Q. As cults go, it's not bad. Q never asks for donations. He doesn't ask for much. He likes it when we create memes but I have never made one. He also asks us to trust certain people, one being Sessions.

"Trust Sessions" is a recurring theme in Q posts. OK, I guess I will trust Sessions after all. Maybe if  I had gotten 23 signatures, I would be so emboldened that as to pursue this thing further. But 22 John Hancocks?

"Trust Sessions"
"Trust Wray"
"Trust Kansas"
"Trust the plan"

I would like to know the plan I am supposed to trust but being one of the faithful and seeing the merits of belief in the unproven and unseen, I now trust Sessions. The trust won't last forever, of course. Then again, we on Planet Q believe something earth-shattering will happen soon. Sessions will lead the charge he has been leading all along.

Please don't break our hearts, Mr. AG.

Class Action?

Is Q/Trump pushing us to jump start class action suits against CIA for domestic spying?
Should we also file suit against NSA?

Are tech and social media companies who knowingly facilitate government spying responsible for the damages inflicted by such actions?

Do companies who provide anti-virus protection with the knowledge that their product or service will not thwart government spyware accept money under false pretenses? If so, would they be vulnerable to class action suits?

Did Q Predict Trey Gowdy Taking A New Position?

Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/14/18 (Sun) 14:49:27 No.22
TRUST SESSIONS.
TG departure [HEC].
NOT to testify.
NOT needed to testify.
Think logically.
NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY.
DO NOT chase MISINFO.
What ROLE might TG be walking into?
Who can WE TRUST?
RATS everywhere.
EVIL everywhere.
TRAITORS everywhere.
NO SUCH AGENCY - VITAL.
RAW INTEL - VITAL.


All of the Q translators seemed to agree that TG stood for Trey Gowdy.
Not sure what [HEC] means. House E____ Committee? Can't think of anything beginning with an E that Gowdy is part of.

Q saying TRUST SESSIONS was actually reassuring for me. Not that I trust Sessions to the end of the Earth but I will put my disapproval of the AG on the back burner for a while.

I suspect Gowdy is going to be named Special Counsel to investigate DOJ and FBI. Just speculation but I still see a bright future for that guy no matter what he decides to do.

Confessions Of An Unreformed Q-Ball

It's a good thing my life is not more interesting because it would be a shame to put it on hold for an obsession like Q anon.

How many things have I put on hold for Q anon? Well, it's not like I was curing cancer or tooth decay.

I believe Q is credible but the storm has to start real soon. This week ideally. If not in February, then it was all a sham.

We have so much Q material that we are now going back to the early days. We are compiling Q's greatest hits. It says something that we now have a Youtuber dedicated to "Q Reviews."

Here is the post I find most intriguing. The whole cloak and dagger "Mueller is on our side" narrative. It cannot be dismissed.

I like this because the YT'er is posting both the text and is reading it aloud. Covers all bases.


Why did POTUS meet Bob under the cover of FBI Dir interview?

The Non-Existent Vast Right Wing Versus The Vaster Non-Existent Right Wing

 It bears repeating and repeat I shall. Repeat I will! Because it bears repeating!

Let me repeat, there is no right wing. The Left Wing is a collective and they are opposed by a coalition, not a collective. Fundamentalist Christians, Randian capitalists, Tea Partiers, paleo-conservatives, neo-conservatives, populists, nationalists, rationalists, skeptics to name but a few categories are unified against a collective that is corrupt, criminal, brutish, thuggish, stupid and woefully anti-American.

If it is too much to discard your belief in a right wing, at least acknowledge that there is no such thing as a right wing monolith. Yes, there is a vast Lefty monolith of cliche-spewing zombies who are gladly spoon-fed their beliefs from the mainstream media and popular culture. Thankfully, our side has no such counterpart.

Which brings us to the demise of "Right Wing News". John Hawkins, the webmeister, blames social media for bullying and abusing conservative news sites. Point taken but then Hawkins relates a second factor in his site's demise (posted at TownHall where he happens to be a columnist. Does he really need RWN to get his word out?)
 
In addition to that, as someone who has been working for a living in this business since 2005, let me drop a little truth bomb on you. We are now in a very oversaturated, corporation-dominated media environment. If you don’t already have a legacy website that captured traffic years ago and held onto it, huge traffic you can bring in from elsewhere, or millions of dollars to spend, your chances of getting a political website off the ground today are infinitesimal.  

 Saturation. I don't agree with the saturation analysis but I do believe that a 2005 business model is probably outdated. The ongoing and only trend in cyber space is precision. Narrow, narrower and narrowest. Dating is too big a topic for a website. Interracial dating? Too broad. Polynesians dating Asians? That site has potential.

We have narrowcasting and a hell of a lot of it. Vast! This has been impressed upon me before but it hit home even harder during my Q tangent. I don't have time for the legacy alternative (if that's not an oxymoron) sites like "National Review" or "Reason" or even relative newcomers like "The Blaze." I stopped going to drudge because too many of his links were to pop culture and to MSM sites. Who cares?

My Internet launch pad was "Larwyn's Linx" an aggregate site that sometimes links to "American Spectator" "NRO" and the like but mostly leads to sites like "Zero Hedge," "Pension Tsunami," "The Burning Platform" and other amateur news outlets. Sites that probably do not have paid staff. Three dozen or so daily links probably jumping to at least 150 unique destinations every week! Yes, now we are at ground zero. Or are we?

"Larwyn's Linx" and "Bad Blue" were briefly cutting edge. When Q emerged, they either missed or dismissed him. They concerned themselves with Mueller and Wolff and Bannon and Shitholes and the president's doctor, subjects I could find time to ignore. 150 avant sites and nothing about Q.

To find out about Q, we would have to probe beneath the underground. A new subterranean was formed. A new cutting edge carved itself a niche. And the--pardon the expression--Vast Right Wing, grew even larger.


I believe in semantics and I will not give up too many concessions but whatever we call the movement, it continues to grow and grow and grow. It's a good time to be alive.

The Memo, Q Anon and Other Rabbit Holes II

As mentioned before, I got into political blogging reluctantly in 2008, trying to find out why people I had respected all my life went Jonestown for an empty suit. I thought with the new administration in place, I could focus my attention on other issues. I was wrong.

Comey, Mueller, Antifa, fake news, fake news, more fake news...this transition was different. Trump was under constant attack and so too, were the average people who elected him. My attention kept coming back to politics.

Rabbit holes galore. Info Wars, Trump Prophecies, Antifa, Jared Kessler, Seth Rich, Sessions, and most recetly, Q Anon.

Q Anon blows my mind. Maybe he will turn out to be a fraudster produced by the deep state to give us false hope and ultimate disappointment. If such is a case, I salute our evil overlords for their originality. They would be clever people to pull this off.

As with the Podesta emails, I don't have time to pour over all the Q Anon posts and I trust others to help with the interpretation. Whereas I was on the Podesta emails from Assange's first drop (but I did not have time to read every message) I came to Q after he had already posted a hundred or so pages. I had some catching up to do.

For a little over a month, I have spent 2 to 3 hours day researching Q Anon. My commute is about 35 minutes and I have a Youtube app on my phone and I listen as I drive to work. Most of the vlogs are audio files in a video format. Nothing to see here, folks. But plenty to listen to.

At home, I put Youtube on in the background as I multitask. I read a few text posts about Q which is about all I have time for in a given day. I believe Q is legit but I will believe more strongly should The Storm commence.

I have gotten to the point where I can decipher a Q post about as well as the experts. Had Q not asked why Eric Schmidt not gone to North Korea, I would not have known why the snake had gone to North Korea so I certainly would not have asked why.

What Q has done is brilliant. By asking questions, he provides--or rather provokes-- an alternative news agenda, a news cycle not respective of the MSM topics de jour. This is bigger than it sounds. For all their efforts, the Rush Limbaughs, Town Halls, Daily Callers and Fox News, are always playing defense. Right or wrong, they are always reacting to an agenda set by MSM (who according to Q, have their agenda set by our CIA, or as he calls them, Clowns In America.) Q, like President Twitter, is wrestling away the news agenda from the legacy players.

Once more, research of an obscure topic has lead me where I did not want to go. Frequently, a rational analysis of Q's queries has resulted in tangents stating that UFO's are piloted by demons, Israel launched a nuclear attack on Hawaii but we can't tell anyone because it would reveal too much detail about our anti-ballistic capabilities. Ditto, the Chinese nuclear sub fired missiles at both Hawaii and Japan because China too, is undergoing a soft civil war and the rogue sub would later be sunk by a Chinese warship. There is the usual pabulum about new world order, globalism, illuminati, Lucifer, Pedogate...But hey, it's better than Sean Hannity on most nights.

Did we always live in such exciting times and just not know it? IDK but it does seem like yesteryear was more predictable, if not more placid.

Q Anon has shaken my perspective in more ways than I thought possible.

The Memo, Q Anon and Other Rabbit Holes.

Yes, I want the memo released and I hope the White House is not delaying its unveiling for dramatic effect (or dramatic affect for that matter.)

Let's hope it's not anticlimactic. Sean Hannity, being Sean Hannity is all of his Sean Hannity attributes, featured non-Congressional guests on his Fox News show, who had NOT viewed the memo, but assured us that the contents were "worse than Watergate." Really? How did you make that assessment, Herman Cain?

A memo, short for memorandum, usually has an author. I searched a few hours/day to find out who wrote THE MEMO! I still don't know. To be bigger than Watergate it had to be written by someone at the upper echelons of our government. That reduces it to maybe 25 people tops.

A few Congressmen have tipped their hands by saying exposure will result in loss of jobs. So in other words, it was not written by HRC, BO, JC1, JC2, JB1, JB2, LL (not Lois Lerner, the tarmac LL) or VJ. These people are retired.

Or maybe the memo was written by one of the initialed and delivered to a McCabe or Rosenstein or some other sleazy crook. I don't know. I do know that I don't want to wait "19 Congressional working days" to read these fabled four pages as we give the Deep State an opportunity to launch a counter attack! And btw, why is this information classified?

I will address q anon in the next post.

#releasethememo

Is This One Of Q Anon's Components?

BTW, hottest current Google search is "Q anon"

Reflections On Q Anon: 4 Chan And 8 Chan

Aaron Spelling I am not. I do not profess to owning a golden gut that tells me that "The Love Boat" will rule prime time Saturday night for years to come. The appeal of Facebook confuses me. The appeal of 4 Chan and 8 Chan confuses me even more.

While Facebook appeals to every blabbermouth, narcissist and phony with a keyboard,
the Chans are utilized by the supercool and the ultra-hip. It's many of the same people who run Linux not because it saves them time or money but because it earns them a badge for style. Open source is so much fun until you want to submit an activities calendar or a mileage sheet to a normie and they can't read your work and are unable to do whatever is required to view your work.

People like Youtuber, Styxenhammer666, get all their news from 4 Chan. Or at least it is their launching pad or aggregator. Maybe if anime and mange interested me more...

8 Chan was probably invented to make 4 Chan seem respectable. I checked in about a week ago after my initial and only visit in 2016. The most popular thread was "Random" and the second most popular was "Teens." Who's their moderator? Anthony Weiner?

For me, the most amazing aspect of Q Anon is not that he can predict a Rothschild plane crash. No, the most jaw-dropping angle is that Q Anon posts on 4 Chan and 8 Chan. But that's just me.