In a Trump Hunt, Beware the Perjury Trap
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Asked if he would agree to be interviewed by Robert Mueller’s team, President Donald Trump told the White House press corps, “I would love to do it … as soon as possible. … under oath, absolutely.”
On hearing this, the special counsel’s office must have looked like the Eagles’ locker room after the 38-7 rout of the Vikings put them in the Super Bowl.
If the president’s legal team lets Trump sit for hours answering Mueller’s agents, they should be disbarred for malpractice.
Complete Article:
Friday, January 26, 2018
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
Sunday, January 21, 2018
Congratulations New England Patriots!
Super Bowl #8 for Brady, Belichick and the Kraft Family.
If you missed it, Jacksonville played an almost perfect game and came up short.
I skipped the NFL since about Week #4 due to the National Anthem desecrations. Oh, but I knew they would get me in the playoffs if New England was on the card. And yes, they are on the card.
Tom Brady is still the most entertaining athlete I have ever seen.
WOW!
If you missed it, Jacksonville played an almost perfect game and came up short.
I skipped the NFL since about Week #4 due to the National Anthem desecrations. Oh, but I knew they would get me in the playoffs if New England was on the card. And yes, they are on the card.
Tom Brady is still the most entertaining athlete I have ever seen.
WOW!
The Non-Existent Vast Right Wing Versus The Vaster Non-Existent Right Wing
It bears repeating and repeat I shall. Repeat I will! Because it bears repeating!
Let me repeat, there is no right wing. The Left Wing is a collective and they are opposed by a coalition, not a collective. Fundamentalist Christians, Randian capitalists, Tea Partiers, paleo-conservatives, neo-conservatives, populists, nationalists, rationalists, skeptics to name but a few categories are unified against a collective that is corrupt, criminal, brutish, thuggish, stupid and woefully anti-American.
If it is too much to discard your belief in a right wing, at least acknowledge that there is no such thing as a right wing monolith. Yes, there is a vast Lefty monolith of cliche-spewing zombies who are gladly spoon-fed their beliefs from the mainstream media and popular culture. Thankfully, our side has no such counterpart.
Which brings us to the demise of "Right Wing News". John Hawkins, the webmeister, blames social media for bullying and abusing conservative news sites. Point taken but then Hawkins relates a second factor in his site's demise (posted at TownHall where he happens to be a columnist. Does he really need RWN to get his word out?)
In addition to that, as someone who has been working for a living in this business since 2005, let me drop a little truth bomb on you. We are now in a very oversaturated, corporation-dominated media environment. If you don’t already have a legacy website that captured traffic years ago and held onto it, huge traffic you can bring in from elsewhere, or millions of dollars to spend, your chances of getting a political website off the ground today are infinitesimal.
Saturation. I don't agree with the saturation analysis but I do believe that a 2005 business model is probably outdated. The ongoing and only trend in cyber space is precision. Narrow, narrower and narrowest. Dating is too big a topic for a website. Interracial dating? Too broad. Polynesians dating Asians? That site has potential.
We have narrowcasting and a hell of a lot of it. Vast! This has been impressed upon me before but it hit home even harder during my Q tangent. I don't have time for the legacy alternative (if that's not an oxymoron) sites like "National Review" or "Reason" or even relative newcomers like "The Blaze." I stopped going to drudge because too many of his links were to pop culture and to MSM sites. Who cares?
My Internet launch pad was "Larwyn's Linx" an aggregate site that sometimes links to "American Spectator" "NRO" and the like but mostly leads to sites like "Zero Hedge," "Pension Tsunami," "The Burning Platform" and other amateur news outlets. Sites that probably do not have paid staff. Three dozen or so daily links probably jumping to at least 150 unique destinations every week! Yes, now we are at ground zero. Or are we?
"Larwyn's Linx" and "Bad Blue" were briefly cutting edge. When Q emerged, they either missed or dismissed him. They concerned themselves with Mueller and Wolff and Bannon and Shitholes and the president's doctor, subjects I could find time to ignore. 150 avant sites and nothing about Q.
To find out about Q, we would have to probe beneath the underground. A new subterranean was formed. A new cutting edge carved itself a niche. And the--pardon the expression--Vast Right Wing, grew even larger.
I believe in semantics and I will not give up too many concessions but whatever we call the movement, it continues to grow and grow and grow. It's a good time to be alive.
Let me repeat, there is no right wing. The Left Wing is a collective and they are opposed by a coalition, not a collective. Fundamentalist Christians, Randian capitalists, Tea Partiers, paleo-conservatives, neo-conservatives, populists, nationalists, rationalists, skeptics to name but a few categories are unified against a collective that is corrupt, criminal, brutish, thuggish, stupid and woefully anti-American.
If it is too much to discard your belief in a right wing, at least acknowledge that there is no such thing as a right wing monolith. Yes, there is a vast Lefty monolith of cliche-spewing zombies who are gladly spoon-fed their beliefs from the mainstream media and popular culture. Thankfully, our side has no such counterpart.
Which brings us to the demise of "Right Wing News". John Hawkins, the webmeister, blames social media for bullying and abusing conservative news sites. Point taken but then Hawkins relates a second factor in his site's demise (posted at TownHall where he happens to be a columnist. Does he really need RWN to get his word out?)
In addition to that, as someone who has been working for a living in this business since 2005, let me drop a little truth bomb on you. We are now in a very oversaturated, corporation-dominated media environment. If you don’t already have a legacy website that captured traffic years ago and held onto it, huge traffic you can bring in from elsewhere, or millions of dollars to spend, your chances of getting a political website off the ground today are infinitesimal.
Saturation. I don't agree with the saturation analysis but I do believe that a 2005 business model is probably outdated. The ongoing and only trend in cyber space is precision. Narrow, narrower and narrowest. Dating is too big a topic for a website. Interracial dating? Too broad. Polynesians dating Asians? That site has potential.
We have narrowcasting and a hell of a lot of it. Vast! This has been impressed upon me before but it hit home even harder during my Q tangent. I don't have time for the legacy alternative (if that's not an oxymoron) sites like "National Review" or "Reason" or even relative newcomers like "The Blaze." I stopped going to drudge because too many of his links were to pop culture and to MSM sites. Who cares?
My Internet launch pad was "Larwyn's Linx" an aggregate site that sometimes links to "American Spectator" "NRO" and the like but mostly leads to sites like "Zero Hedge," "Pension Tsunami," "The Burning Platform" and other amateur news outlets. Sites that probably do not have paid staff. Three dozen or so daily links probably jumping to at least 150 unique destinations every week! Yes, now we are at ground zero. Or are we?
"Larwyn's Linx" and "Bad Blue" were briefly cutting edge. When Q emerged, they either missed or dismissed him. They concerned themselves with Mueller and Wolff and Bannon and Shitholes and the president's doctor, subjects I could find time to ignore. 150 avant sites and nothing about Q.
To find out about Q, we would have to probe beneath the underground. A new subterranean was formed. A new cutting edge carved itself a niche. And the--pardon the expression--Vast Right Wing, grew even larger.
I believe in semantics and I will not give up too many concessions but whatever we call the movement, it continues to grow and grow and grow. It's a good time to be alive.
The Memo, Q Anon and Other Rabbit Holes II
As mentioned before, I got into political blogging reluctantly in 2008, trying to find out why people I had respected all my life went Jonestown for an empty suit. I thought with the new administration in place, I could focus my attention on other issues. I was wrong.
Comey, Mueller, Antifa, fake news, fake news, more fake news...this transition was different. Trump was under constant attack and so too, were the average people who elected him. My attention kept coming back to politics.
Rabbit holes galore. Info Wars, Trump Prophecies, Antifa, Jared Kessler, Seth Rich, Sessions, and most recetly, Q Anon.
Q Anon blows my mind. Maybe he will turn out to be a fraudster produced by the deep state to give us false hope and ultimate disappointment. If such is a case, I salute our evil overlords for their originality. They would be clever people to pull this off.
As with the Podesta emails, I don't have time to pour over all the Q Anon posts and I trust others to help with the interpretation. Whereas I was on the Podesta emails from Assange's first drop (but I did not have time to read every message) I came to Q after he had already posted a hundred or so pages. I had some catching up to do.
For a little over a month, I have spent 2 to 3 hours day researching Q Anon. My commute is about 35 minutes and I have a Youtube app on my phone and I listen as I drive to work. Most of the vlogs are audio files in a video format. Nothing to see here, folks. But plenty to listen to.
At home, I put Youtube on in the background as I multitask. I read a few text posts about Q which is about all I have time for in a given day. I believe Q is legit but I will believe more strongly should The Storm commence.
I have gotten to the point where I can decipher a Q post about as well as the experts. Had Q not asked why Eric Schmidt not gone to North Korea, I would not have known why the snake had gone to North Korea so I certainly would not have asked why.
What Q has done is brilliant. By asking questions, he provides--or rather provokes-- an alternative news agenda, a news cycle not respective of the MSM topics de jour. This is bigger than it sounds. For all their efforts, the Rush Limbaughs, Town Halls, Daily Callers and Fox News, are always playing defense. Right or wrong, they are always reacting to an agenda set by MSM (who according to Q, have their agenda set by our CIA, or as he calls them, Clowns In America.) Q, like President Twitter, is wrestling away the news agenda from the legacy players.
Once more, research of an obscure topic has lead me where I did not want to go. Frequently, a rational analysis of Q's queries has resulted in tangents stating that UFO's are piloted by demons, Israel launched a nuclear attack on Hawaii but we can't tell anyone because it would reveal too much detail about our anti-ballistic capabilities. Ditto, the Chinese nuclear sub fired missiles at both Hawaii and Japan because China too, is undergoing a soft civil war and the rogue sub would later be sunk by a Chinese warship. There is the usual pabulum about new world order, globalism, illuminati, Lucifer, Pedogate...But hey, it's better than Sean Hannity on most nights.
Did we always live in such exciting times and just not know it? IDK but it does seem like yesteryear was more predictable, if not more placid.
Q Anon has shaken my perspective in more ways than I thought possible.
Comey, Mueller, Antifa, fake news, fake news, more fake news...this transition was different. Trump was under constant attack and so too, were the average people who elected him. My attention kept coming back to politics.
Rabbit holes galore. Info Wars, Trump Prophecies, Antifa, Jared Kessler, Seth Rich, Sessions, and most recetly, Q Anon.
Q Anon blows my mind. Maybe he will turn out to be a fraudster produced by the deep state to give us false hope and ultimate disappointment. If such is a case, I salute our evil overlords for their originality. They would be clever people to pull this off.
As with the Podesta emails, I don't have time to pour over all the Q Anon posts and I trust others to help with the interpretation. Whereas I was on the Podesta emails from Assange's first drop (but I did not have time to read every message) I came to Q after he had already posted a hundred or so pages. I had some catching up to do.
For a little over a month, I have spent 2 to 3 hours day researching Q Anon. My commute is about 35 minutes and I have a Youtube app on my phone and I listen as I drive to work. Most of the vlogs are audio files in a video format. Nothing to see here, folks. But plenty to listen to.
At home, I put Youtube on in the background as I multitask. I read a few text posts about Q which is about all I have time for in a given day. I believe Q is legit but I will believe more strongly should The Storm commence.
I have gotten to the point where I can decipher a Q post about as well as the experts. Had Q not asked why Eric Schmidt not gone to North Korea, I would not have known why the snake had gone to North Korea so I certainly would not have asked why.
What Q has done is brilliant. By asking questions, he provides--or rather provokes-- an alternative news agenda, a news cycle not respective of the MSM topics de jour. This is bigger than it sounds. For all their efforts, the Rush Limbaughs, Town Halls, Daily Callers and Fox News, are always playing defense. Right or wrong, they are always reacting to an agenda set by MSM (who according to Q, have their agenda set by our CIA, or as he calls them, Clowns In America.) Q, like President Twitter, is wrestling away the news agenda from the legacy players.
Once more, research of an obscure topic has lead me where I did not want to go. Frequently, a rational analysis of Q's queries has resulted in tangents stating that UFO's are piloted by demons, Israel launched a nuclear attack on Hawaii but we can't tell anyone because it would reveal too much detail about our anti-ballistic capabilities. Ditto, the Chinese nuclear sub fired missiles at both Hawaii and Japan because China too, is undergoing a soft civil war and the rogue sub would later be sunk by a Chinese warship. There is the usual pabulum about new world order, globalism, illuminati, Lucifer, Pedogate...But hey, it's better than Sean Hannity on most nights.
Did we always live in such exciting times and just not know it? IDK but it does seem like yesteryear was more predictable, if not more placid.
Q Anon has shaken my perspective in more ways than I thought possible.
The Memo, Q Anon and Other Rabbit Holes.
Yes, I want the memo released and I hope the White House is not delaying its unveiling for dramatic effect (or dramatic affect for that matter.)
Let's hope it's not anticlimactic. Sean Hannity, being Sean Hannity is all of his Sean Hannity attributes, featured non-Congressional guests on his Fox News show, who had NOT viewed the memo, but assured us that the contents were "worse than Watergate." Really? How did you make that assessment, Herman Cain?
A memo, short for memorandum, usually has an author. I searched a few hours/day to find out who wrote THE MEMO! I still don't know. To be bigger than Watergate it had to be written by someone at the upper echelons of our government. That reduces it to maybe 25 people tops.
A few Congressmen have tipped their hands by saying exposure will result in loss of jobs. So in other words, it was not written by HRC, BO, JC1, JC2, JB1, JB2, LL (not Lois Lerner, the tarmac LL) or VJ. These people are retired.
Or maybe the memo was written by one of the initialed and delivered to a McCabe or Rosenstein or some other sleazy crook. I don't know. I do know that I don't want to wait "19 Congressional working days" to read these fabled four pages as we give the Deep State an opportunity to launch a counter attack! And btw, why is this information classified?
I will address q anon in the next post.
#releasethememo
Let's hope it's not anticlimactic. Sean Hannity, being Sean Hannity is all of his Sean Hannity attributes, featured non-Congressional guests on his Fox News show, who had NOT viewed the memo, but assured us that the contents were "worse than Watergate." Really? How did you make that assessment, Herman Cain?
A memo, short for memorandum, usually has an author. I searched a few hours/day to find out who wrote THE MEMO! I still don't know. To be bigger than Watergate it had to be written by someone at the upper echelons of our government. That reduces it to maybe 25 people tops.
A few Congressmen have tipped their hands by saying exposure will result in loss of jobs. So in other words, it was not written by HRC, BO, JC1, JC2, JB1, JB2, LL (not Lois Lerner, the tarmac LL) or VJ. These people are retired.
Or maybe the memo was written by one of the initialed and delivered to a McCabe or Rosenstein or some other sleazy crook. I don't know. I do know that I don't want to wait "19 Congressional working days" to read these fabled four pages as we give the Deep State an opportunity to launch a counter attack! And btw, why is this information classified?
I will address q anon in the next post.
#releasethememo
Chemtrail
I saw my first chemtrail yesterday right before dusk. My sigoth brought it to my attention as we were driving to bocce fundraiser.
We did awful in bocce, btw. Oh well. Good cause.
I always dismissed chemtrails as jet vapor. The whole subject was a little too Clyde Lewis to me. This trail was not jet vapor, at least the kind we are familiar with. It was lower in altitude and much broader. Then again, if a trail is lower in altitude and closer to the eye, it would look broader, no?
Whatever else might result from chemtrails, they don't seem to be killing off our wildlife. On the drive to bocce, we stopped for a porcupine crossing the road. A quarter mile later we saw a heard of 7 to 8 deer. A few miles later we saw another herd of about the same size. We see 2-3 flocks of wild turkeys every day.
Not sure who leaves chemtrails or for what reason. But I am now a believer in their existence.
We did awful in bocce, btw. Oh well. Good cause.
I always dismissed chemtrails as jet vapor. The whole subject was a little too Clyde Lewis to me. This trail was not jet vapor, at least the kind we are familiar with. It was lower in altitude and much broader. Then again, if a trail is lower in altitude and closer to the eye, it would look broader, no?
Whatever else might result from chemtrails, they don't seem to be killing off our wildlife. On the drive to bocce, we stopped for a porcupine crossing the road. A quarter mile later we saw a heard of 7 to 8 deer. A few miles later we saw another herd of about the same size. We see 2-3 flocks of wild turkeys every day.
Not sure who leaves chemtrails or for what reason. But I am now a believer in their existence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)