Hey Obama: Who's Your Daddy?

The death of JFK and the life of Barack Obama are two enduring mysteries that might be linked and might be illuminated by Q and Donald Trump. Long shots yes, but...

The most incomprehensible matter I have ever faced is that America had a two-term unvetted president.

The second most incomprehensible matter I have ever faced is  that roughly half of America does not want  Barack Obama vetted. They are downright phobic on this issue. Truth is their worst nightmare. Any beacon of truth surely must be racist to the core.

I will state my position once more. Barack Obama was born in Hawaii a US citizen but he probably lost his citizenship when he was adopted by the Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro. Barack Obama is probably an Indonesian citizen and thus, was never eligible for the US Presidency,

The birth certificate issue was played masterfully by Obama's people and dimwits like Joe Arpaio took the bait. Had "The Birthers" focused their attention on Barry's Indonesian citizenship, history might have yielded a better chapter. To paraphrase Gary Larson, the bull strategically went for the cape.

Obama's lineage and its importance has been downplayed. Was his maternal grandfather a CIA agent? Was his mother a CIA asset? Why oh why oh why oh why was an adolescent Barack Obama introduced to Frank Marshall Davis? As far as I know, BO only wrote two poems and one seems to bear the theme of man-boy love. But someone thought it essential to introduce a wayward teenager to a perverted Communist.

Barack Obama is not an intellectual heavyweight but he has niches of expertise. Unfortunately, those niches are Communist theory and Islamic politics. As a freshman at Occidental, Barry (the name he used to call himself at the time) could and would speak endlessly about radical theory. He was well-versed on this topic.

Likewise, President Obama understood the Shia vs Sunni rivalry in all of its myriad detail. Good that he had that knowledge but how did he absorb all that? Did he study Middle East politics as an undergrad? Oh darn. His records are sealed and he was The Invisible Man at Columbia. Maybe one of his fawning biographers could help us out here. No? Not returning calls? Yo! Mr. Remmick!

If you study the JFK assassination, you will get frustrated. Every time you think you have it nailed down, something upsets your apple cart. You think it was the Mafia and then H. L. Hunt makes a death bed confession. And you think it was the CIA after all until you learn that Billy Sol Estes's grand jury testimony implicated LBJ in not one, not two, not three but eight homicides, including the murder of  President Kennedy. The conspiracies start to contradict each other.

So it is with all things related to The International Man of Mystery. He was a CIA spawn. He was a Saudi deep spy. He was an Iranian deep spy. He pretended to be a Saudi spy but he double crossed them to help their arch-enemies, the Iranians. He was the fruition of a century of Communist conspiracy....

I don't know. What I do know is that the official narrative is spotty at best. I also know that there was a cover-up. What exactly was obliterated? I don't know but I do know that an inordinate number of records have been sealed and the news media won't go near certain subjects. I also know that people who publicly raise certain topics are likely to be audited and in the case of Joe Arpaio, prosecuted on spurious charges.

Which brings us back to BO's real father. My once-favorite website, "American Thinker", started overloading their site with browser-crippling ads and I stopped reading their great work. So I missed this from January 14, 2014: "Barack Hussein Soebarkah?"

This article seemed to kick off yet another chapter in the "Who's Obama's Daddy" parlor game. I had other issues to attend to and this topic escaped  my attention. Recently, I saw a picture of  Muhammad Subud Soebarkah. Did this spry 61 year old sire our 44th president?

Conspiracy overload? Gotcha. But let's look at the cult leader in question.

 

Yes, there are lookalikes tossed to the far corners of the world. But please be reminded that this man's name had been handwritten onto a young Barack Obama's passport and later crossed out. Stanley Dunham was a member of the Subud cult that thrived in Indonesia, Hawaii and Chicago. She was certainly familiar with this man.

Others have connected some dots for us.

Conclusion: It's high time Barack Obama was vetted.

The Obama Portraits Without Irony, Sarcasm Or Snide Remarks. Part 2: The President

                                                           

As impartial and unbiased and neutral as I can be on the subject, this is one of the most bizarre chapters in American history.

It goes like this: President Obama, in all of his grandeur and self-esteem, simply could not have a presidential portrait that in any way resembled other presidential portraits. So he commissioned controversial artist Kehinde Wiley to complete the job.

Kehinde Wiley, either motivated by his own quest for notoriety or his need to trash the office of the president, launched an obviously disrespectful product. In the process of degradation, Barack Obama became collateral damage. There is no other logical conclusion.

First, allow us to let the self-professed arbiters of truth, Snopes.com, summarize one aspect of the portrait.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                                                           Spermatoza:

The official portrait of former President Barack Obama contains secretly-placed images of sperm cells, including one on his forehead.

RATING

 FALSE

ORIGIN

It was perhaps inevitable that controversy would surround the unveiling of former President Obama’s official portrait in February 2018, given that it was painted by Kehinde Wiley, a gay African-American artist who is also a self-professed provocateur.

The Internet bristled with reproductions of two of Wiley’s previous works depicting black women holding the severed heads of white people — tableaux some decried as “racist” — even as conservative pundits went on about supposedly detected representations of “sperm cells” in Obama’s portrait.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If you are interested, Snopes countered by calling the anons who magnified the portrait, drum roll please, racist trolls.

Magnification reveals a large foreign object under the president's left temple that just so happens to resemble a sperm cell. 

Now let's back up a little bit. Hidden sperm is Wiley's signature.

In the following concoction, the sperm are not hidden. Magnify at your own risk.

By the way, I claim fair use for what might be copyrighted work. 

On the issue of hidden sperm, Snopes is clearly wrong, if not openly deceptive. The MSM has launched several refutation efforts that are easily found with a search engine. Yes, Barack Obama has a prominent vein on yes left temple. No, he does not have a baby snake submerged under his skin. Wiley used the vein to hide his trademark.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Obama's Hands:

Wiley has given Obama a left hand with six fingers or two right hands.

There is either a sixth finger (as well as a left thumb) submerged or a right thumb submerged. What is Wiley telling us?

I don't know about the six fingers but we have some history concerning two right hands.

Pharaohs have been drawn  with two right hands.

And there is this explanation.

I don't know what Wiley is trying to communicate. What we know is that he is communicating his message intentionally.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                                           The Flowers:

Flowers do not have a static symbolism. Saints are sometimes associated with specific species of flowers and they find their way into various coats of arms.

Flowers often symbolize fertility. Makes sense.

Pansy is slang for sissy.

For all the discussion of the flowers' hidden meaning, it seems that there might have been some "cut and paste" involved.

Maybe the flowers are just a device to remove Obama from an American backdrop. There is nothing obviously American in this portrait. Nothing presidential. Whatever else might be said about the flowery, florid, leafy background, no gravitas is conveyed. None. Nada. Zilch.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                                                The Pose:

Life is kinetic. There is hidden motion in snapshots and still life drawings. I am not the first to suggest that this portrait conveys a man sitting on a toilet. Yes, Obama is clothed and he is seated on a chair and not a porcelain throne but, look closely (as painful as that might be) at the pose.

Does this altered photo look more authentic?

Wiley, for all his foolishness, knows what he is doing. He is trashing America and the presidency. If  Barry gets dusted up in the process, that's art..

Despite what he has said publicly, I don't think Mr. Styrofoam Greek Column is pleased with Wiley's work.

Is The Internet Bill Of Rights Just The Repackaging Of Net Neutrality ?

Net Neutrality was doomed from the starting gate. Whatever it was supposed to be--other than something sinister advanced by the likes of Soros and Obama--was never really communicated. The silly ass slogan "net neutrality" did not inspire thought or feeling or anything else.

The Internet Bill Of Rights sounds great on pixel but let's think this through. This is not so much a Bill of Rights as it is a set of regulations that favor "us" over "them".

Whatever else might be said Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, et al, they are private companies offering free services. How many people who complain about Google's data mining bother to use a proxy server? How many use the search engine, Duckduckgo?

And yes, Google does bury material that might be unfavorable to say, Barack Obama. A subject that has interested me for about a decade is the Obama Halo. This cheesy ass propaganda campaign might be what got BO elected in 2008. Do a Google search and you will get links to the video game Halo or the song of the same name. Do a Duckduckgo search and you can relive that Jonestown era when friends and family discovered their new deity. An endless stream of small sites who exposed the flim flam.

How many people who complain about Youtube censorship or demonetization post to Bitchute or Dtube or Vimeo? Google owns Youtube and they are no more obligated to post your material than is your local radio station obligated to provide Keith Ellison with three hours to rebut Rush Limbaugh. Do we really want an Internet Fairness Doctrine? Think it through, folks.

I for one am opposed to antitrust laws as we know them. Yes, if they were to be applied to things like public education or civic taxi monopolies or civic cable monopolies or a multitude of professions that use bogus licensure to do all the things that anti-trust laws are supposed to be used to protect the public...then I would be all for antitrust laws.

Unfortunately, antitrust laws are but one more weapon for the politically connected. Howard Hughes was one of the wealthiest men in the world but he woefully lacked political acumen. He would be the target of a wacky application of antitrust for purposes that were never crystal clear.

I mention antitrust laws because some of the same voices who sing the praises of IBOR also advocate for antitrust laws being applied to Google and Facebook. There are dozens if not hundreds of arguments against this sort of action. For brevity sake, let us examine one.

Microsoft was attacked by the Clinton Administration primarily for giving away freebies with their operating system. The Clinton Administration, liquored up by huge donations from Microsoft donors, advanced the absurd viewpoint that the public would be better served if they had to shell out an extra fifty bucks for Netscape Navigator. How dare they provide Internet Explorer for free!

The net result of Clinton's saber-rattling: Microsoft has consummated an amorous relationship with the Democrat Party, with or without the legal sanction of matrimony. Microsoft and her employees have donated millions to the Democrat coffers. MSNBC provides 24/7 promotion of the DNC agenda, as does the MSN portal and the Bing search engine as well. If you think the co-opting of what was once an apolitical corporation is not related to the original threat of antitrust legislation, you might be an idiot. Tread lightly, my friends.

The same people who advocate for IBOR also suggest that the Internet be regulated as a public utility? Do we even need to list all the reasons why that is a bad idea? Do we need to be reminded of the Obama Administration's efforts to use the FCC to regulate (as in shut YOU down forever) the Internet as a public utility? Do we need to point out the obvious differences between the Internet and the delivery of natural gas? Can you heat your house with 5g delivery using your cell phone? Wake up, people! (Or if you prefer, get woke.)

One more wretched idea promoted by the IBOR crowd: Let Donald Trump install his own FTC administrators and then sic them on people we do not like.

So, we won't be draining the swamp, we will just replace the leeches with our own? The mosquitoes will work for us now? The swamp will still produce methane but it will be our methane? Swamps are lovely places. Who doesn't love a swamp and all of its lovely creatures?

Net neutrality, Internet Bill of Rights, FCC regulation, FTC regulation, DOJ interference. The results are all pretty much the same. More control by the Beltway over the citizenry. All of these vehicles that might prop us up can shut us down.

The IBOR wants to use the hammer of justice to reward us and to punish them. This is what happens when we place proper nouns ahead of principles.  A preachy reminder: principles endure where people fail us. Red pill.