Was that a slip of the twongue? Nunes only revealed a conspiracy to sabotage a free election as well as a conspiracy to commit espionage, and possibly a conspiracy to commit sedition. Some pundits even accuse you and your organized crime cartel of treason.
Oh that? Who hasn't picked up a parking ticket along the way?
In other words, they didn't find the bodies. Commodore Nunes alertly spotted the iceberg. Give the Eagle Scout some credit for his keen observations but chuckle at the damn fool who has missed all that lurks beneath the surface. (Insert sound of weasels laughing here.)
We are told that more such memos will follow. Let us hope, Director Comey, that the Leavenworth administrators will allow you to teach your ethical leadership class via Skype.
The Nunes memo was much like a high profile murder case in which everyone knows the suspect is guilty. The guilty verdict is read and we are not even slightly surprised at the results. We already knew what the jury has confirmed.
The difference between the real life murder case and real life is that in the former we don't have to worry about the court reporter rewriting the transcripts, the judge flashing gang signs to the defendants, the bailiffs opening fire on the jurors, or the prosecutors savaged by a sneak of weasels as they exit the courtroom. For that matter, the high profile murder prosecutor probably does not worry about being gunned down at baseball practice or colliding with a garbage truck as he merrily rides an Amtrak.
We are just getting started. I will hereby go way out on a limb and predict that Jimmy the Weasel will never again tweet "Is that it?" Wanna bet?
Showing posts with label #releasethememo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #releasethememo. Show all posts
Sunday, February 4, 2018
Sunday, January 21, 2018
The Memo, Q Anon and Other Rabbit Holes II
As mentioned before, I got into political blogging reluctantly in 2008, trying to find out why people I had respected all my life went Jonestown for an empty suit. I thought with the new administration in place, I could focus my attention on other issues. I was wrong.
Comey, Mueller, Antifa, fake news, fake news, more fake news...this transition was different. Trump was under constant attack and so too, were the average people who elected him. My attention kept coming back to politics.
Rabbit holes galore. Info Wars, Trump Prophecies, Antifa, Jared Kessler, Seth Rich, Sessions, and most recetly, Q Anon.
Q Anon blows my mind. Maybe he will turn out to be a fraudster produced by the deep state to give us false hope and ultimate disappointment. If such is a case, I salute our evil overlords for their originality. They would be clever people to pull this off.
As with the Podesta emails, I don't have time to pour over all the Q Anon posts and I trust others to help with the interpretation. Whereas I was on the Podesta emails from Assange's first drop (but I did not have time to read every message) I came to Q after he had already posted a hundred or so pages. I had some catching up to do.
For a little over a month, I have spent 2 to 3 hours day researching Q Anon. My commute is about 35 minutes and I have a Youtube app on my phone and I listen as I drive to work. Most of the vlogs are audio files in a video format. Nothing to see here, folks. But plenty to listen to.
At home, I put Youtube on in the background as I multitask. I read a few text posts about Q which is about all I have time for in a given day. I believe Q is legit but I will believe more strongly should The Storm commence.
I have gotten to the point where I can decipher a Q post about as well as the experts. Had Q not asked why Eric Schmidt not gone to North Korea, I would not have known why the snake had gone to North Korea so I certainly would not have asked why.
What Q has done is brilliant. By asking questions, he provides--or rather provokes-- an alternative news agenda, a news cycle not respective of the MSM topics de jour. This is bigger than it sounds. For all their efforts, the Rush Limbaughs, Town Halls, Daily Callers and Fox News, are always playing defense. Right or wrong, they are always reacting to an agenda set by MSM (who according to Q, have their agenda set by our CIA, or as he calls them, Clowns In America.) Q, like President Twitter, is wrestling away the news agenda from the legacy players.
Once more, research of an obscure topic has lead me where I did not want to go. Frequently, a rational analysis of Q's queries has resulted in tangents stating that UFO's are piloted by demons, Israel launched a nuclear attack on Hawaii but we can't tell anyone because it would reveal too much detail about our anti-ballistic capabilities. Ditto, the Chinese nuclear sub fired missiles at both Hawaii and Japan because China too, is undergoing a soft civil war and the rogue sub would later be sunk by a Chinese warship. There is the usual pabulum about new world order, globalism, illuminati, Lucifer, Pedogate...But hey, it's better than Sean Hannity on most nights.
Did we always live in such exciting times and just not know it? IDK but it does seem like yesteryear was more predictable, if not more placid.
Q Anon has shaken my perspective in more ways than I thought possible.
Comey, Mueller, Antifa, fake news, fake news, more fake news...this transition was different. Trump was under constant attack and so too, were the average people who elected him. My attention kept coming back to politics.
Rabbit holes galore. Info Wars, Trump Prophecies, Antifa, Jared Kessler, Seth Rich, Sessions, and most recetly, Q Anon.
Q Anon blows my mind. Maybe he will turn out to be a fraudster produced by the deep state to give us false hope and ultimate disappointment. If such is a case, I salute our evil overlords for their originality. They would be clever people to pull this off.
As with the Podesta emails, I don't have time to pour over all the Q Anon posts and I trust others to help with the interpretation. Whereas I was on the Podesta emails from Assange's first drop (but I did not have time to read every message) I came to Q after he had already posted a hundred or so pages. I had some catching up to do.
For a little over a month, I have spent 2 to 3 hours day researching Q Anon. My commute is about 35 minutes and I have a Youtube app on my phone and I listen as I drive to work. Most of the vlogs are audio files in a video format. Nothing to see here, folks. But plenty to listen to.
At home, I put Youtube on in the background as I multitask. I read a few text posts about Q which is about all I have time for in a given day. I believe Q is legit but I will believe more strongly should The Storm commence.
I have gotten to the point where I can decipher a Q post about as well as the experts. Had Q not asked why Eric Schmidt not gone to North Korea, I would not have known why the snake had gone to North Korea so I certainly would not have asked why.
What Q has done is brilliant. By asking questions, he provides--or rather provokes-- an alternative news agenda, a news cycle not respective of the MSM topics de jour. This is bigger than it sounds. For all their efforts, the Rush Limbaughs, Town Halls, Daily Callers and Fox News, are always playing defense. Right or wrong, they are always reacting to an agenda set by MSM (who according to Q, have their agenda set by our CIA, or as he calls them, Clowns In America.) Q, like President Twitter, is wrestling away the news agenda from the legacy players.
Once more, research of an obscure topic has lead me where I did not want to go. Frequently, a rational analysis of Q's queries has resulted in tangents stating that UFO's are piloted by demons, Israel launched a nuclear attack on Hawaii but we can't tell anyone because it would reveal too much detail about our anti-ballistic capabilities. Ditto, the Chinese nuclear sub fired missiles at both Hawaii and Japan because China too, is undergoing a soft civil war and the rogue sub would later be sunk by a Chinese warship. There is the usual pabulum about new world order, globalism, illuminati, Lucifer, Pedogate...But hey, it's better than Sean Hannity on most nights.
Did we always live in such exciting times and just not know it? IDK but it does seem like yesteryear was more predictable, if not more placid.
Q Anon has shaken my perspective in more ways than I thought possible.
The Memo, Q Anon and Other Rabbit Holes.
Yes, I want the memo released and I hope the White House is not delaying its unveiling for dramatic effect (or dramatic affect for that matter.)
Let's hope it's not anticlimactic. Sean Hannity, being Sean Hannity is all of his Sean Hannity attributes, featured non-Congressional guests on his Fox News show, who had NOT viewed the memo, but assured us that the contents were "worse than Watergate." Really? How did you make that assessment, Herman Cain?
A memo, short for memorandum, usually has an author. I searched a few hours/day to find out who wrote THE MEMO! I still don't know. To be bigger than Watergate it had to be written by someone at the upper echelons of our government. That reduces it to maybe 25 people tops.
A few Congressmen have tipped their hands by saying exposure will result in loss of jobs. So in other words, it was not written by HRC, BO, JC1, JC2, JB1, JB2, LL (not Lois Lerner, the tarmac LL) or VJ. These people are retired.
Or maybe the memo was written by one of the initialed and delivered to a McCabe or Rosenstein or some other sleazy crook. I don't know. I do know that I don't want to wait "19 Congressional working days" to read these fabled four pages as we give the Deep State an opportunity to launch a counter attack! And btw, why is this information classified?
I will address q anon in the next post.
#releasethememo
Let's hope it's not anticlimactic. Sean Hannity, being Sean Hannity is all of his Sean Hannity attributes, featured non-Congressional guests on his Fox News show, who had NOT viewed the memo, but assured us that the contents were "worse than Watergate." Really? How did you make that assessment, Herman Cain?
A memo, short for memorandum, usually has an author. I searched a few hours/day to find out who wrote THE MEMO! I still don't know. To be bigger than Watergate it had to be written by someone at the upper echelons of our government. That reduces it to maybe 25 people tops.
A few Congressmen have tipped their hands by saying exposure will result in loss of jobs. So in other words, it was not written by HRC, BO, JC1, JC2, JB1, JB2, LL (not Lois Lerner, the tarmac LL) or VJ. These people are retired.
Or maybe the memo was written by one of the initialed and delivered to a McCabe or Rosenstein or some other sleazy crook. I don't know. I do know that I don't want to wait "19 Congressional working days" to read these fabled four pages as we give the Deep State an opportunity to launch a counter attack! And btw, why is this information classified?
I will address q anon in the next post.
#releasethememo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)