Originally posted June 18, 2009
Let's be fair. It is possible that Williams misspoke. That he knew that Kennedy never ran against Eisenhower but that Nixon (Eisenehower's vice president) was an extension of the Eisenhower Administration. Maybe he accidentally misstated the facts. But he did not clarify as well as he should have.
Williams then repeats the analogy. And in the context, it appears that he does believe Eisenhower ran against Kennedy because McCain the war hero is sort of the political Eisenhower of his era. He is certainly comparing Eisenhower and McCain.
Is Williams a moron? If the standard is beyond reasonable doubt, he has a chance at acquittal. If the standard is a preponderance of evidence, the viewers and the voters will be awarded damages.
Oh, and you might notice that Mensa member Dave does not correct his intellectual twin on his absurdities.
PALIN HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING HALF THIS STUPID
Media Elitism, The Death of Journalism, Media Bias, Voter Fraud, Destructive Economics and other things Obama
Showing posts with label Letterman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Letterman. Show all posts
Saturday, April 26, 2014
Thursday, September 8, 2011
Retro Thurday: Brilliant Montage
Yes, we just posted this July 25 of this year but it deserves another look (and another and another)
A MASTERPIECE OF TRUTH
A MASTERPIECE OF TRUTH
Monday, July 25, 2011
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Monday, July 13, 2009
Media Monday: Brian Williams and David Letterman Trash Palin...And Give Obama Yet Another Free Pass
The ironies piled up. They bash Palin for her inexperience when she certainly had more executive experience than Obama. And MENSA group Williams insinuates that Palin is stupid. This is the same interview when the pretty boy compares the 2008 election to the Kennedy-Eisenhower election.
EVER WONDER WHAT HIGH-PRICED WHORES LOOK LIKE?
EVER WONDER WHAT HIGH-PRICED WHORES LOOK LIKE?
Friday, June 19, 2009
CBS Seems to be Pulling Anti-Palin Material.
Letterman attacked Palin over and over and over. You can look it up on Youtube but a few of his routines have been removed by CBS. I am only speculating but the frequency of Letterman attacks could be a potential PR problem for the Tiffany network.
Just speculating.
Just speculating.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Does Brian Williams Think Kennedy Ran Against Eisenhower?
Let's be fair. It is possible that Williams misspoke. That he knew that Kennedy never ran against Eisenhower but that Nixon (Eisenehower's vice president) was an extension of the Eisenhower Administration. Maybe he accidentally misstated the facts. But he did not clarify as well as he should have.
Williams then repeats the analogy. And in the context, it appears that he does believe Eisenhower ran against Kennedy because McCain the war hero is sort of the political Eisenhower of his era. He is certainly comparing Eisenhower and McCain.
Is Williams a moron? If the standard is beyond reasonable doubt, he has a chance at acquittal. If the standard is a preponderance of evidence, the viewers and the voters will be rewarded damages.
Oh, and you might notice that Mensa member Dave does not correct his intellectual twin on his absurdities.
PALIN HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING HALF THIS STUPID
Williams then repeats the analogy. And in the context, it appears that he does believe Eisenhower ran against Kennedy because McCain the war hero is sort of the political Eisenhower of his era. He is certainly comparing Eisenhower and McCain.
Is Williams a moron? If the standard is beyond reasonable doubt, he has a chance at acquittal. If the standard is a preponderance of evidence, the viewers and the voters will be rewarded damages.
Oh, and you might notice that Mensa member Dave does not correct his intellectual twin on his absurdities.
PALIN HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING HALF THIS STUPID
Why is Palin So Threatening to the Media Elite.
Even in defeat Palin is still the object of hate for the upper crust.
THE $32 MILLION DOLLAR MAN PUMMELS THE SMALL TOWN GIRL
THE $32 MILLION DOLLAR MAN PUMMELS THE SMALL TOWN GIRL
Letterman and McClellan
I disapprove of Bush because he spent too much money (a drop in the bucket it would turn out, when compared to that Obama fellow.) But Cheney and Bush took the defense of our country, and the West, seriously. Letterman cannot even concoct a half-baked conspiracy theory. How is it again, that the oil companies benefitted from the Iraq War?
Dave is like so many other Dems in that he knows who he is supposed to hate but does not know why. His muttering about privatizing the military and replacing them with Haliburton. So what, Dave? Doesn't that mean that he's taken soldiers out of harm's way (and replaced them with despicable Haliburton employees?)
McClellan provides the perfect backdrop to deliver the unbridled silliness. Two manifestations of Judas. McClellan betrayed Bush. Letterman betrayed his audience. No wonder you're in third place in the ratings, Dave.
Dave is like so many other Dems in that he knows who he is supposed to hate but does not know why. His muttering about privatizing the military and replacing them with Haliburton. So what, Dave? Doesn't that mean that he's taken soldiers out of harm's way (and replaced them with despicable Haliburton employees?)
McClellan provides the perfect backdrop to deliver the unbridled silliness. Two manifestations of Judas. McClellan betrayed Bush. Letterman betrayed his audience. No wonder you're in third place in the ratings, Dave.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Letterman, Imus, Stern
I saw a news report about an anti-Letterman protest in NYC. The people shown were as frightening as Obama supporters. One should advise against overkill. It is wise to keep one's attacks proportional or one can easily turn the aggriever into the aggrieved.
Bill Clinton was gracelessly attacked by Kenneth Starr and the news media and those attacks solidified his approval ratings. Like most Americans, I saw the Starr hearings as a witch hunt, a fishing expedition, a giant farce. I never voted for Clinton but I felt sorry for him and I had no sympathy for the petty people who publicly humiliated him.
Something similar might happen with Letterman. The people outside the CBS studio were chanting "perv" and calling him a sex offender. People, your greatest weapon is the truth. Letterman is to be despised because he is spineless, gutless and ballsless but his verbal attacks on a 14 year old girl were anything but sexually motivated. Nor is Letterman part of a widespread conspiracy against women and his comments do not promote the sexual abuse of anyone (I would take exception to Palin's comments on this issue but then again that was not Governor Palin talking, it was Mother Bear Palin talking. She has more license.)
As with Don Imus before him, Letterman's larger sin is that he has ceased to be funny. You can get away with anything if you are funny. Howard Stern gets away with much more edgy material than his rivals because he is not simply outrageous; he is outrageous in a humorous way.
Imus got run off the air for calling the Rutgers basketball team "a bunch of nappy-headed ho's." That line is DOA. No comedian who ever lived could make that line work because there isn't even an element of humor to it. "It's the difference between 'your momma's so stupid she has to call information to get the number for 9-1-1' and 'your momma sucks.' Imus's comment did not even rise to the joke level.
But Imus's non-joke was delivered in the context of declining ratings and a career that was always of dubious quality. Imus's slogan could have been "I am not Howard Stern." People who hated Stern wanted a Stern-Lite to knock the King on his ass. Imus was that guy. But Imus never delivered the goods. He was the Joey Bishop of radio who just kept going and going and going.
Whereas Imus was never funny, Letterman is a bona fide has been. He was probably always bitter but for years he masked his bitterness in humor. When the humor vanished a decade or so ago, we were left with distilled bitterness and bad ratings. Dave never regained his edge.
Letterman, Imus, Opie and Anthony: their downfall was never "going too far." Their downfall was a chronic lack of humor. When Howard Stern is no longer funny, he might join the list. But for now, Stern is king. You can get away with anything if you are funny.
Bill Clinton was gracelessly attacked by Kenneth Starr and the news media and those attacks solidified his approval ratings. Like most Americans, I saw the Starr hearings as a witch hunt, a fishing expedition, a giant farce. I never voted for Clinton but I felt sorry for him and I had no sympathy for the petty people who publicly humiliated him.
Something similar might happen with Letterman. The people outside the CBS studio were chanting "perv" and calling him a sex offender. People, your greatest weapon is the truth. Letterman is to be despised because he is spineless, gutless and ballsless but his verbal attacks on a 14 year old girl were anything but sexually motivated. Nor is Letterman part of a widespread conspiracy against women and his comments do not promote the sexual abuse of anyone (I would take exception to Palin's comments on this issue but then again that was not Governor Palin talking, it was Mother Bear Palin talking. She has more license.)
As with Don Imus before him, Letterman's larger sin is that he has ceased to be funny. You can get away with anything if you are funny. Howard Stern gets away with much more edgy material than his rivals because he is not simply outrageous; he is outrageous in a humorous way.
Imus got run off the air for calling the Rutgers basketball team "a bunch of nappy-headed ho's." That line is DOA. No comedian who ever lived could make that line work because there isn't even an element of humor to it. "It's the difference between 'your momma's so stupid she has to call information to get the number for 9-1-1' and 'your momma sucks.' Imus's comment did not even rise to the joke level.
But Imus's non-joke was delivered in the context of declining ratings and a career that was always of dubious quality. Imus's slogan could have been "I am not Howard Stern." People who hated Stern wanted a Stern-Lite to knock the King on his ass. Imus was that guy. But Imus never delivered the goods. He was the Joey Bishop of radio who just kept going and going and going.
Whereas Imus was never funny, Letterman is a bona fide has been. He was probably always bitter but for years he masked his bitterness in humor. When the humor vanished a decade or so ago, we were left with distilled bitterness and bad ratings. Dave never regained his edge.
Letterman, Imus, Opie and Anthony: their downfall was never "going too far." Their downfall was a chronic lack of humor. When Howard Stern is no longer funny, he might join the list. But for now, Stern is king. You can get away with anything if you are funny.
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Letterman Trashes Palin, Strokes Obama.
Everyone knows Palin's an idiot. The media elite did everything in their power to get that message across. Dave shows the powers that be why he is worth $32 million (sure as hell ain't the ratings.)
PALIN GETS THE LETTERMAN TREATMENT
OBAMA GETS THE LETTERMAN TREATMENT
PALIN GETS THE LETTERMAN TREATMENT
OBAMA GETS THE LETTERMAN TREATMENT
Sarah Palin: Punching Bag
The logic is mind-numbingly twisted. Because Palin has always been a punching bag of the media elite, she has no right to complain about Letterman's recent attacks. The window of protest has closed, decrees Shannyn Moore.
First, Ms. Moore, there was an upcoming election the first time the media bigwigs attacked her. Yes, there was overt bias and pronounced bile--that would have been labled hate speech if it had been directed against a media-sanctioned candidate--but it was in the context of a presidential election. It was extremely biased political speech but it was political speech nonetheless. It is harder to make that case against CBS's recent insults of a 14 year old girl.
Second, Palin could not possibly defend herself from the series of ambushes by the media elite. The sheer volume of those attacks amde it impossible to defend herself. No other public figure has been the lightning rod that was Palin 2008.
Thank you, Ms. Moore, for chronicling a series of attacks (the tip of the tip of the iceberg) against Sarah Palin and her family. Ironically you make the point that I have tried to make, that the media are in the tank for Obama and they will use every weapon in their arsenal to crush anyone who dares criticize their pampered superstar. You illustrate just how frequently and how visciously the smears piled up.
For the complete link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shannyn-moore/top-10-reasons-sarah-pali_b_215468.html
First, Ms. Moore, there was an upcoming election the first time the media bigwigs attacked her. Yes, there was overt bias and pronounced bile--that would have been labled hate speech if it had been directed against a media-sanctioned candidate--but it was in the context of a presidential election. It was extremely biased political speech but it was political speech nonetheless. It is harder to make that case against CBS's recent insults of a 14 year old girl.
Second, Palin could not possibly defend herself from the series of ambushes by the media elite. The sheer volume of those attacks amde it impossible to defend herself. No other public figure has been the lightning rod that was Palin 2008.
Thank you, Ms. Moore, for chronicling a series of attacks (the tip of the tip of the iceberg) against Sarah Palin and her family. Ironically you make the point that I have tried to make, that the media are in the tank for Obama and they will use every weapon in their arsenal to crush anyone who dares criticize their pampered superstar. You illustrate just how frequently and how visciously the smears piled up.
For the complete link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shannyn-moore/top-10-reasons-sarah-pali_b_215468.html
Sunday, June 14, 2009
An Open Letter to Sarah Palin
Sever all ties with the mainstream media. Please don't repeat the mistake your running mate, John McCain, made. He thought he could trust the media to be fair. That judgment, or rather that lack of judgment, cost him dearly.
If you bank on "New York Times" to be fair, you deserve to lose. Remember the innuendo The Gray Lady spread about the senator and a certain lobbyist? Facts be damned! Do you remember the sleazy tabloid hit pieces that NYT used to smear Cindy McCain? This was the same organization that killed a highly relevant ACORN story just weeks before the election. All the news that's fit to spike.
Governor, you are a lightning rod because you share the values, hopes and dreams of most Americans. For that reason, elitists hate you. The media elite hate you even more. These are people who profess their love for working people but tremble at the possibility of a blue collar person holding public office. They despise working people, people who come from working families, people from small towns, people who did not attend the right schools and worst of all, they despise outsiders. As in, people from outside The Beltway.
But please do not grow discouraged by the slings and arrows of outrageous media. The fact that they hate you--and yes, they do hate you--shows the rest of us that you are probably a good person and possibly a worthy presidential candidate. Now is the time to show the effete snobs just how obsolete they really are. In an era of blogs, websites and digital video, you don't need the mainstream media for publicity. You can reach your audience directly.
We were all taken aback by Letterman's comments. But why did you appear on "The Today Show" later in the week? Granted, you are a ratings boost, and giving NBC face time sends a message to CBS. But pitting the media against one another won't work for very long. They maintain their genteel rivalries, but they will never be enemies. The members of Meadowbrook Polo Club do not pummel the members of the Oakbrook Polo Club with their trusty mallets. They hammer away at a little white ball and sip champagne with their competitors afterward. You will always be that little white ball. Keep that in mind.
But you don't have to show up at the polo grounds. Don't sit down with them! They can have the same access to your speeches and town hall meetings that everyone else has. Let them Twitter and Facebook and search Youtube. Do not participate in your own crucifixion.
Ironically, the mainstream media might help you in the long run. There are plenty of voters--like me or instance--who are uncomfortable with terms like liberal and conservative but who will vote against big media in a heart beat. When our enemies find a new enemy, it rekindles our interest in public affairs.
"I didn't come here to earn your good opinion." Live by your words, Governor Palin. Stop trying to earn their good opinion. Remember your next line. "I came here to serve the people of this great country." The choice is obvious. Serve your country or earn the media's good opinion. You cannot do both.
If you bank on "New York Times" to be fair, you deserve to lose. Remember the innuendo The Gray Lady spread about the senator and a certain lobbyist? Facts be damned! Do you remember the sleazy tabloid hit pieces that NYT used to smear Cindy McCain? This was the same organization that killed a highly relevant ACORN story just weeks before the election. All the news that's fit to spike.
Governor, you are a lightning rod because you share the values, hopes and dreams of most Americans. For that reason, elitists hate you. The media elite hate you even more. These are people who profess their love for working people but tremble at the possibility of a blue collar person holding public office. They despise working people, people who come from working families, people from small towns, people who did not attend the right schools and worst of all, they despise outsiders. As in, people from outside The Beltway.
But please do not grow discouraged by the slings and arrows of outrageous media. The fact that they hate you--and yes, they do hate you--shows the rest of us that you are probably a good person and possibly a worthy presidential candidate. Now is the time to show the effete snobs just how obsolete they really are. In an era of blogs, websites and digital video, you don't need the mainstream media for publicity. You can reach your audience directly.
We were all taken aback by Letterman's comments. But why did you appear on "The Today Show" later in the week? Granted, you are a ratings boost, and giving NBC face time sends a message to CBS. But pitting the media against one another won't work for very long. They maintain their genteel rivalries, but they will never be enemies. The members of Meadowbrook Polo Club do not pummel the members of the Oakbrook Polo Club with their trusty mallets. They hammer away at a little white ball and sip champagne with their competitors afterward. You will always be that little white ball. Keep that in mind.
But you don't have to show up at the polo grounds. Don't sit down with them! They can have the same access to your speeches and town hall meetings that everyone else has. Let them Twitter and Facebook and search Youtube. Do not participate in your own crucifixion.
Ironically, the mainstream media might help you in the long run. There are plenty of voters--like me or instance--who are uncomfortable with terms like liberal and conservative but who will vote against big media in a heart beat. When our enemies find a new enemy, it rekindles our interest in public affairs.
"I didn't come here to earn your good opinion." Live by your words, Governor Palin. Stop trying to earn their good opinion. Remember your next line. "I came here to serve the people of this great country." The choice is obvious. Serve your country or earn the media's good opinion. You cannot do both.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
An Open Letter to David Letterman
Dave, I was once a big fan of yours. You were my hero. You were bold. Irreverent. Unpredictable. You defied categorization. You took a stale medium and turned it on its ear.
It wasn't just that you were funny. Other people could make that claim. You were different. You were, well, Dave. We bonded with you. We loved you in a way that we did not love entertainers, especially TV stars.
In the 80's the Letterman cult was loyal and devoted and I was pretty close to a charter member. Your fans were not typical TV fans. We were more like Deadheads or Phishheads or Red Sox Nation. Perhaps the only TV cult that surpassed the Letterman cult--in theatrics if not in fervor--was the "Star Trek" cult. But Trekkies never loved Shatner the way we loved you. We really loved you, Dave.
Maybe you were an elitist pig all along but you were able to disguise it. Maybe that man of the people thing was one big sham. It wasn't just your humor, it was your courage. If it was a movie star, an NBC hack or a big shot of any kind, you Dave, knocked them off their pedestal. You were the kid who made rude comments about emperors' clothing. David Letterman: Man of the People.
But somewhere along the way, Dave, you lost your edge. Maybe it was success. Maybe it was money. Maybe it was boredom. An unmistakable bitterness set in that competed with your humor. You took shelter in formula. For whatever reason, Dave, you lost your courage.
No comedian ever rose to the top without courage. None of them get where they got by charting the course of lesser resistance. Unfortunately, when they reach the top they usually start playing it safe. They grow rich and fat and spineless. Pusillanimity is their constant companion.
When the most pompous, the most pampered, the most inflated, the least analyzed, the least scrutinized, the least inspected, and yes, the least tested superstar in history emerged on the scene, the Dave we had grown to know and love was not there to greet him. You sold us out, Dave. You joined the legion of poltroonish cocksuckers. It is hard to imagine a vintage 85 Letterman taking Obama's engorged member to the lower depths of his esophagus. It is hard to imagine the angry young Dave wiping the jism from his lips and studying it under the moonlight. It is hard to imagine the NBC Dave savoring a septic peanut and proclaiming to the world that it tastes like cheese cake. But this is the Dave we have come to know. Dave, the slayer of superstars, had become a superstar. There are no clowns on Mount Olympus.
Dave, if your obsequiousness was nauseating for its cowardice, your attacks on Sarah Palin (to say nothing of her 14 year old daughter) were ruthlessly emetic. Somewhere along the way, simple cowardice was not enough for you. Yours was conspicuous cowardice. Contemptuous cowardice. Divert your eyes because it hurts to watch cowardice. Dave, you have morphed into a pussy. A wuss. A twit. A flit. An empty vessel. A wimp. Ah, but you could still toss your chamber pot at the peasants with the best in Hollywood.
Dave, your comments hurt in a way that Sean Penn and Brad Pitt and Matt Damon and Ben Affleck can never hurt. Those people were always smug cocksuckers. They will always be smug cocksuckers. They live for the purpose of cultivating and flaunting their well-honed sense of superiority. Of course, they will always side with fellow elitists. Elitism is their very essence. But Dave, you were the antidote to the smug cocksucker. For a while, you really were the voice of the people.
There is something sadly ironic about your trashing Sarah Palin. That is, Palin 2008 came closer to capturing the spirit of Letterman 1984, than anyone, including the 2008 Letterman. It is easy to imagine a premenopausal Letterman pointing out that the man who would be king spent years wandering the streets with no actual responsibilities. It is not hard to imagine Dave in his prime poking fun of a man of marginal achievement writing two autobiographies. And yes, the Dave we grew up with would have had a field day with the hokey-ass styrofoam Greek columns. Palin 2008 had not yet lost her courage.
I cannot entirely stop loving you, Dave. You were my hero and when the mob ridicules my favorite has been, I am quick to remind them that you were once the funniest man in the world. But Dave, watching you now is like watching another has been, the formerly formidable Muhammad Ali. These days Ali walks like a butterfly and talks like a bee. Kind of like your monologues. But do remember, there is a major distinction between you two has beens. Ali never lost his courage and as a result, he stayed too long. You Dave, abandoned your courage, and because of that, you stayed too long.
It's time to hang it up, Dave. Go home and count all of your money. But do go home. And don't come back. You fucking sell out.
It wasn't just that you were funny. Other people could make that claim. You were different. You were, well, Dave. We bonded with you. We loved you in a way that we did not love entertainers, especially TV stars.
In the 80's the Letterman cult was loyal and devoted and I was pretty close to a charter member. Your fans were not typical TV fans. We were more like Deadheads or Phishheads or Red Sox Nation. Perhaps the only TV cult that surpassed the Letterman cult--in theatrics if not in fervor--was the "Star Trek" cult. But Trekkies never loved Shatner the way we loved you. We really loved you, Dave.
Maybe you were an elitist pig all along but you were able to disguise it. Maybe that man of the people thing was one big sham. It wasn't just your humor, it was your courage. If it was a movie star, an NBC hack or a big shot of any kind, you Dave, knocked them off their pedestal. You were the kid who made rude comments about emperors' clothing. David Letterman: Man of the People.
But somewhere along the way, Dave, you lost your edge. Maybe it was success. Maybe it was money. Maybe it was boredom. An unmistakable bitterness set in that competed with your humor. You took shelter in formula. For whatever reason, Dave, you lost your courage.
No comedian ever rose to the top without courage. None of them get where they got by charting the course of lesser resistance. Unfortunately, when they reach the top they usually start playing it safe. They grow rich and fat and spineless. Pusillanimity is their constant companion.
When the most pompous, the most pampered, the most inflated, the least analyzed, the least scrutinized, the least inspected, and yes, the least tested superstar in history emerged on the scene, the Dave we had grown to know and love was not there to greet him. You sold us out, Dave. You joined the legion of poltroonish cocksuckers. It is hard to imagine a vintage 85 Letterman taking Obama's engorged member to the lower depths of his esophagus. It is hard to imagine the angry young Dave wiping the jism from his lips and studying it under the moonlight. It is hard to imagine the NBC Dave savoring a septic peanut and proclaiming to the world that it tastes like cheese cake. But this is the Dave we have come to know. Dave, the slayer of superstars, had become a superstar. There are no clowns on Mount Olympus.
Dave, if your obsequiousness was nauseating for its cowardice, your attacks on Sarah Palin (to say nothing of her 14 year old daughter) were ruthlessly emetic. Somewhere along the way, simple cowardice was not enough for you. Yours was conspicuous cowardice. Contemptuous cowardice. Divert your eyes because it hurts to watch cowardice. Dave, you have morphed into a pussy. A wuss. A twit. A flit. An empty vessel. A wimp. Ah, but you could still toss your chamber pot at the peasants with the best in Hollywood.
Dave, your comments hurt in a way that Sean Penn and Brad Pitt and Matt Damon and Ben Affleck can never hurt. Those people were always smug cocksuckers. They will always be smug cocksuckers. They live for the purpose of cultivating and flaunting their well-honed sense of superiority. Of course, they will always side with fellow elitists. Elitism is their very essence. But Dave, you were the antidote to the smug cocksucker. For a while, you really were the voice of the people.
There is something sadly ironic about your trashing Sarah Palin. That is, Palin 2008 came closer to capturing the spirit of Letterman 1984, than anyone, including the 2008 Letterman. It is easy to imagine a premenopausal Letterman pointing out that the man who would be king spent years wandering the streets with no actual responsibilities. It is not hard to imagine Dave in his prime poking fun of a man of marginal achievement writing two autobiographies. And yes, the Dave we grew up with would have had a field day with the hokey-ass styrofoam Greek columns. Palin 2008 had not yet lost her courage.
I cannot entirely stop loving you, Dave. You were my hero and when the mob ridicules my favorite has been, I am quick to remind them that you were once the funniest man in the world. But Dave, watching you now is like watching another has been, the formerly formidable Muhammad Ali. These days Ali walks like a butterfly and talks like a bee. Kind of like your monologues. But do remember, there is a major distinction between you two has beens. Ali never lost his courage and as a result, he stayed too long. You Dave, abandoned your courage, and because of that, you stayed too long.
It's time to hang it up, Dave. Go home and count all of your money. But do go home. And don't come back. You fucking sell out.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Saturday, May 9, 2009
The Ass Kissing Continues
I am so old.
I said I am so old.
No really, I am so old.
How old are you?
Thank you. Sorry I woke you but thank you very much. I am so old I can remember when Letterman was funny. No, really. He was. He was.
I am so old I can remember when Leno was funny.
I am so old I can remember when Bill Maher was funny.
Can you remember when Conan was funny?
No, I can't remember that.
Letterman is a heavyweight who stayed far past his prime and it is now painful for his old fans to watch him wobble on his feet. Like Bill Maher and Chris Rock, Dave has successfully transitioned from comedian to sycophant. The pay is better, to say nothing of job security.
HEY DAVE! DOES IT REALLY TASTE LIKE PEANUT BUTTER?
I said I am so old.
No really, I am so old.
How old are you?
Thank you. Sorry I woke you but thank you very much. I am so old I can remember when Letterman was funny. No, really. He was. He was.
I am so old I can remember when Leno was funny.
I am so old I can remember when Bill Maher was funny.
Can you remember when Conan was funny?
No, I can't remember that.
Letterman is a heavyweight who stayed far past his prime and it is now painful for his old fans to watch him wobble on his feet. Like Bill Maher and Chris Rock, Dave has successfully transitioned from comedian to sycophant. The pay is better, to say nothing of job security.
HEY DAVE! DOES IT REALLY TASTE LIKE PEANUT BUTTER?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)