Media Elitism, The Death of Journalism, Media Bias, Voter Fraud, Destructive Economics and other things Obama
Showing posts with label morons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label morons. Show all posts
Friday, November 16, 2012
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
What if Palin Said This?
For a slew of personal reasons I have slowed down on the blogging. In addition to the lifestyle changes I detected a change (is that word copyrighted?)in the air. I believe that even Obama's hard core zombies realize that they elected a buffoon.
Obama was dealt a royal flush and he might still somehow lose the political farm for his party. His once questionable leadership has jelled into definite, tangible, touchable leadership. He is leading his party over a cliff. He is indeed a leader.
Despite his emerging leadership skills, Obama is still a hopeless moron.
LAW PROFESSORS DON'T NEED NO STINKING MATH
Obama was dealt a royal flush and he might still somehow lose the political farm for his party. His once questionable leadership has jelled into definite, tangible, touchable leadership. He is leading his party over a cliff. He is indeed a leader.
Despite his emerging leadership skills, Obama is still a hopeless moron.
LAW PROFESSORS DON'T NEED NO STINKING MATH
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Does Brian Williams Think Kennedy Ran Against Eisenhower?
Let's be fair. It is possible that Williams misspoke. That he knew that Kennedy never ran against Eisenhower but that Nixon (Eisenehower's vice president) was an extension of the Eisenhower Administration. Maybe he accidentally misstated the facts. But he did not clarify as well as he should have.
Williams then repeats the analogy. And in the context, it appears that he does believe Eisenhower ran against Kennedy because McCain the war hero is sort of the political Eisenhower of his era. He is certainly comparing Eisenhower and McCain.
Is Williams a moron? If the standard is beyond reasonable doubt, he has a chance at acquittal. If the standard is a preponderance of evidence, the viewers and the voters will be rewarded damages.
Oh, and you might notice that Mensa member Dave does not correct his intellectual twin on his absurdities.
PALIN HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING HALF THIS STUPID
Williams then repeats the analogy. And in the context, it appears that he does believe Eisenhower ran against Kennedy because McCain the war hero is sort of the political Eisenhower of his era. He is certainly comparing Eisenhower and McCain.
Is Williams a moron? If the standard is beyond reasonable doubt, he has a chance at acquittal. If the standard is a preponderance of evidence, the viewers and the voters will be rewarded damages.
Oh, and you might notice that Mensa member Dave does not correct his intellectual twin on his absurdities.
PALIN HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING HALF THIS STUPID
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)