Saturday, December 31, 2016
Even The Dems Are Piling On Our Failed President
ERIC ZUESSE | 31.12.2016 | WORLD
Obama’s Failed Presidency
I’m a former lifelong Democrat, stating here a clear and incontestable fact: Barack Obama is a failed President.
It’s true not just because of the sad realities such as that «Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94 % Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time» — or, as the economists Alan Krueger and Lawrence Katz wrote in the original of that study: «94 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015 appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements». («Alternative work arrangements» referred there to Americans who were involuntarily working only part-time jobs — they simply couldn’t find full-time, though that’s what they wanted.) In other words: Obama’s failure isn’t just because of America’s increasingly sales-clerk, and burger-flipping, workforce.
And Obama’s failure is also not just because «Poverty Rose In 96 % Of U.S. House Districts, During Obama’s Presidency». (However, that reality turned out to be decisive in Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump on November 8th, as Nate Cohn pointed out in The New York Times on December 23rd, headlining, «How the Obama Coalition Crumbled, Leaving an Opening for Trump». Hillary was running on Obama’s poor record.
The Russians Hacked The Election (Insert Laugh Track Here)
I am starting to believe there might be something to that post-modernism after all. The purveyors of fake news create a fake news witch hunt while promoting a fake news bonanza stating that "the Russians hacked the election."
The silly ass meme could be halted with one question: "Specifically, what constitutes election hacking?"
Even if the worst accusations against (that are not all that grievous) were proven to be true, that the Russkies used advanced cyber technology to gain access to Podesta's emails and then handed them over to Julian Assange--Assange denies any Russian connection--does this mean that we should sanction or punish foreign nationals who have aided and abetted the Democrats?
Citizen of the World-At-Large, George Soros, has interfered in American elections for three decades. In 2016 he extended his scope to successfully influence local races. Do his actions constitute election hacking?
Carlos Slim, a Mexican national who at various times has been listed as the wealthiest man on Planet Earth, is rabidly anti-Trump. In 2015 he became the largest single investor in "The New York Times." Ironically (said with a hint of irony) it was this esteemed purveyor of fake news that illegally procured Donald Trump's tax records in the 2016 presidential election season. Does this illegality constitute election hacking?
Does the slanted reporting of foreign news entities, like BBC, Al Jazeera, Russia Times constitute election hacking? Regarding Russia Times, does anyone care to make the point that they have promoted a pro-Trump agenda? Good luck squaring that circle.
This from Ricochet.
The media is intentionally lying to the public because they want a better excuse for Election Day than the reality. They would rather focus on hacking, the popular vote, FBI Director James Comey, or the minuscule alt-right, instead of accepting that American voters slightly preferred Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, at least in the states where it counted. People wanted change over the ineptness, cronyism, and stagnation of the Obama era. They didn’t trust the utterly untrustable Clinton and liked her even less.
The silly ass meme could be halted with one question: "Specifically, what constitutes election hacking?"
Even if the worst accusations against (that are not all that grievous) were proven to be true, that the Russkies used advanced cyber technology to gain access to Podesta's emails and then handed them over to Julian Assange--Assange denies any Russian connection--does this mean that we should sanction or punish foreign nationals who have aided and abetted the Democrats?
Citizen of the World-At-Large, George Soros, has interfered in American elections for three decades. In 2016 he extended his scope to successfully influence local races. Do his actions constitute election hacking?
Carlos Slim, a Mexican national who at various times has been listed as the wealthiest man on Planet Earth, is rabidly anti-Trump. In 2015 he became the largest single investor in "The New York Times." Ironically (said with a hint of irony) it was this esteemed purveyor of fake news that illegally procured Donald Trump's tax records in the 2016 presidential election season. Does this illegality constitute election hacking?
Does the slanted reporting of foreign news entities, like BBC, Al Jazeera, Russia Times constitute election hacking? Regarding Russia Times, does anyone care to make the point that they have promoted a pro-Trump agenda? Good luck squaring that circle.
This from Ricochet.
The media is intentionally lying to the public because they want a better excuse for Election Day than the reality. They would rather focus on hacking, the popular vote, FBI Director James Comey, or the minuscule alt-right, instead of accepting that American voters slightly preferred Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, at least in the states where it counted. People wanted change over the ineptness, cronyism, and stagnation of the Obama era. They didn’t trust the utterly untrustable Clinton and liked her even less.
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
A Sad, Sad Day: Thomas Sowell's Last Column
It would be a sadder day if I was announcing Thomas Sowell's passing. That is not the case. The 86 year old will no longer write columns, however, and that is tragic.
I know of no writer who is so sharp and so blunt at the same time. In researching something else I traipsed through Sowell's Amazon gallery. I read the One-star comments on his book. I could not find one review that actually refuted anything Sowell had written. If you are not aware, there is an "Occupy Amazon" movement that assigns bad reviews to Non-Leftist writers, sometimes minutes after a book is released. The reviews are usually three sentences or fewer, snide if not vicious, and woefully lacking any evidence that the reviewer had read the book. Perhaps it says more about the Left than about Sowell that no one ever disproved anything he had written.
Sowell was a teacher by trade, and a damn good one. If I could recommend just one of his books, that book would be "Vision Of The Anointed," perhaps the best insight yet into the Leftist mind.
Enjoy your retirement, Dr. Sowell. You deserve it.
Sowell's Farewell
I know of no writer who is so sharp and so blunt at the same time. In researching something else I traipsed through Sowell's Amazon gallery. I read the One-star comments on his book. I could not find one review that actually refuted anything Sowell had written. If you are not aware, there is an "Occupy Amazon" movement that assigns bad reviews to Non-Leftist writers, sometimes minutes after a book is released. The reviews are usually three sentences or fewer, snide if not vicious, and woefully lacking any evidence that the reviewer had read the book. Perhaps it says more about the Left than about Sowell that no one ever disproved anything he had written.
Sowell was a teacher by trade, and a damn good one. If I could recommend just one of his books, that book would be "Vision Of The Anointed," perhaps the best insight yet into the Leftist mind.
Enjoy your retirement, Dr. Sowell. You deserve it.
Sowell's Farewell
Sunday, December 25, 2016
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Let Us Not Ruin Our Holiday Cheer But...
This will be the best Christmas in a long time. We will celebrate CHRISTMAS this year and say thanks for the relief of pressure from around our necks. We will breathe a little deeper this holiday season.
So we may not be inclined to interrupt our Gemutlichkeit to examine every facet of an ugly event. Some of us though, just won't be able to help ourselves.
I am referring to the US's Security Council abstention. That is so, so, so characteristically Obama.
Action through inaction.
Working behind the scenes on an ulterior motive.
Deception.
Opaqueness.
More facets than we can list here. Yet, one of these viewpoints outshines all others. That would the priss factor. It is the seeking of vengeance on a matter that should not be personal. As we have seen, everything is personal with Obama. This is Zsa Zsa slapping a cop named Netanyahu. The cop walks away unhurt but duly insulted and humiliated by a privileged diva. The priss factor.
Let us revisit our holiday cheer. Not even our Diva-in-chief can ruin this Christmas.
So we may not be inclined to interrupt our Gemutlichkeit to examine every facet of an ugly event. Some of us though, just won't be able to help ourselves.
I am referring to the US's Security Council abstention. That is so, so, so characteristically Obama.
Action through inaction.
Working behind the scenes on an ulterior motive.
Deception.
Opaqueness.
More facets than we can list here. Yet, one of these viewpoints outshines all others. That would the priss factor. It is the seeking of vengeance on a matter that should not be personal. As we have seen, everything is personal with Obama. This is Zsa Zsa slapping a cop named Netanyahu. The cop walks away unhurt but duly insulted and humiliated by a privileged diva. The priss factor.
Let us revisit our holiday cheer. Not even our Diva-in-chief can ruin this Christmas.
As Tiny Tim says, "A Merry Christmas to us all; God bless us, every one!"
Friday, December 23, 2016
Summarizing A Sunset On An Overcast Day
Barack Obama is a sad excuse. The saddest thing is not his warmongering. His worst crime is not padding the pockets of Silicon Valley billionaires, nor is his peddling of madman George Soros’ poison. Dismantling America’s Constitution, creating a morally deprived playground out of his country, clowning when others suffer, even getting valiant American soldiers killed is not cause to disrespect a US president. No, the reason my sweet and smart wife is wrong about respecting the president is not because of mistakes. Barack Obama is an unrepentant failure in leading his people. This is why he should be shunned, why he should leave the White House with his tail tucked between his legs. Instead the New York Times, CNN, the major networks, the sellout news, the Jeff Bezos types who bought up media, and the crazy liberals must prop him up. The empowered must have their champion intact.
No. Barack Obama betrayed America in no uncertain terms. He could have stood up, he decided to go along. He could have paved the steady way, but he caved in to the empowered self indulgers. He could have made peace and prosperity for all, instead he shunned billions of people in favor of a few. Barack Obama could have made us all proud to be Americans, instead he showed the world our vilest characteristics, our worst sportsmanship and fair play, and how “we” are worth more than “them”. A good man does not respect such things, he despises them. I lost respect for Barack Obama not for his mistakes, but for the vast possibility he left in the dirt.
http://journal-neo.org/2016/12/19/good-riddance-a-final-upside-down-salute-to-barack-obama/
http://journal-neo.org/2016/12/19/good-riddance-a-final-upside-down-salute-to-barack-obama/
How Apropos: Obama Concludes His Term By Voting "Present" At the UN
The United Nations Security Council has passed a previously postponed vote to end Israeli settlements after the U.S. abstained from voting.
Donald J. Trump
U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power gave a statement after the vote saying that the U.S. chose not to vote on the resolution "because the resolution is too narrowly focused on settlements." She began her statement in the Security Council with the words of Ronald Reagan in 1985 that settlements are “in no way necessary for the security of Israel” and “only diminishes the confidence of Arabs.”
Trump Tweet followed:
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th.
Thursday, December 22, 2016
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Monday, December 19, 2016
Saturday, December 17, 2016
OOPS
I always link to the original source when I cut and paste. Yesterday, I pasted something, got interrupted and never returned to the footnote. Now I can't seem to find the original source. Anyone want to come to our lost and found department and claim their lost link? Sorry for the unintended plagiarism.
Friday, December 16, 2016
Irony Or Hypocrisy: Unite For America Uses Website Registered In Canada
According to a search on ICANN WHOIS, a website that provides public access to data on registered URL names, UniteForAmerica.org was created on Nov. 26 with internet service provider Tucows Inc., located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monday, December 12, 2016
The MSM's Amazing Ability To Control The Narrative
Don't eulogize the dinosaur media just yet. They are still the 8-ton octopus in the room.
Now the narrative is that the Russians "hacked" our elections. Ergo, Hillary is a victim and Trump is undeserving of his victory.
This story could be shut down quickly, but give the partisan press their due. They can and do tell us where to focus our attention. Why is it assumed that the Russians would prefer Hillary over Trump? I hold the strong belief that Russia shares the perspective of every other oil-producing country. They want to make sure American energy stays in the ground. The Trump Agenda threatens the world oil oligarchy. Hillary's green agenda does not.
If Russia has the ability to lift 50,000 emails, I doubt if they want to reveal this to the world. If they possess Podesta and Hillary emails they might want to see her in the White House just for her vulnerability to blackmail. Why would they blow their cover to help Donald Trump?
If the Russians--or anyone else for that matter--does have access to emails routed to and from Secretary Clinton's unsecured server, it is Hillary Clinton's felonious fault. The DNC emails were more likely leaked than hacked. Why else would Julian Assange, a man of limited means, offer a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Seth Rich?
Were the Podesta emails hacked by Russians? According to Assange, they were not. We should take Steve Pieczenik's comments with a grain of salt but he says that it was US Intelligence insiders who leaked the treasure trove. That seems much more likely both because they are more likely to do so and they had their own motives (like patriotism, for instance) to keep Hillary out of office.
Russia hacking our election? Nyet. Another case of fake news.
Now the narrative is that the Russians "hacked" our elections. Ergo, Hillary is a victim and Trump is undeserving of his victory.
This story could be shut down quickly, but give the partisan press their due. They can and do tell us where to focus our attention. Why is it assumed that the Russians would prefer Hillary over Trump? I hold the strong belief that Russia shares the perspective of every other oil-producing country. They want to make sure American energy stays in the ground. The Trump Agenda threatens the world oil oligarchy. Hillary's green agenda does not.
If Russia has the ability to lift 50,000 emails, I doubt if they want to reveal this to the world. If they possess Podesta and Hillary emails they might want to see her in the White House just for her vulnerability to blackmail. Why would they blow their cover to help Donald Trump?
If the Russians--or anyone else for that matter--does have access to emails routed to and from Secretary Clinton's unsecured server, it is Hillary Clinton's felonious fault. The DNC emails were more likely leaked than hacked. Why else would Julian Assange, a man of limited means, offer a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Seth Rich?
Were the Podesta emails hacked by Russians? According to Assange, they were not. We should take Steve Pieczenik's comments with a grain of salt but he says that it was US Intelligence insiders who leaked the treasure trove. That seems much more likely both because they are more likely to do so and they had their own motives (like patriotism, for instance) to keep Hillary out of office.
Russia hacking our election? Nyet. Another case of fake news.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Will Keith Olbermann Become Pitchman For Midol?
If you can't stomach Olbermann, I understand. You will not be tested on this material. I admit, however, I find this guy much more bearable when he is having a meltdown.
SOMETHING SO ENDEARING ABOUT A GRAY HAIRED ADOLESCENT
SOMETHING SO ENDEARING ABOUT A GRAY HAIRED ADOLESCENT
Judge Jeanine Does It Again
Fox News has made some upgrades since the election, most significantly replacing Never Trump Doofus, Brit Hume with Tucker Carlson. Megan Kelly might jump to CNN. They still have Greg Gutfeld on at all hours but let's take comfort where we find it.
Pirro is as laser-sharp as ever. It is a rarity for a Youtube video to have a 10:1 Views to Like ratio. This video currently is below 4. Unheard of! The most favorable reception I have ever seen!
Pirro is as laser-sharp as ever. It is a rarity for a Youtube video to have a 10:1 Views to Like ratio. This video currently is below 4. Unheard of! The most favorable reception I have ever seen!
"New York Times" On NPR
This is painful to listen to but reveals much about the promoters of fake news. I heard this interview in its original broadcast. On listening to it a second I had to stop it around the 5 minute when the topic of Obama's birthplace came up. NPR and NYT both know Barack Obama himself invented the "Born in Kenya" meme and yet, they call Donald Trump a liar for parroting the original lie. Even this hardened media critic has trouble grasping the audacity of falsehood that permeates the 4th Estate.
Breitbart posts the "Fresh Air" interview in its entirety. This conversation is not for the weak of stomach.
Breitbart posts the "Fresh Air" interview in its entirety. This conversation is not for the weak of stomach.
New Parlor Game: Worst Fake News Lists
Have you heard that Hillary Clinton thinks we need to immediately do something about “fake news?”
"It is now clear that so-called fake news can have real-world consequences. This is not about politics or partisanship. Lives are at risk — lives of ordinary people just trying to go about their days and do their jobs, contribute to their communities. It is a danger that must be addressed and addressed quickly....It is imperative that leaders in both the private and public sector step up to protect our democracy and innocent lives."
Who would have ever realized that the woman who lied about landing under sniper fire in Bosnia, receiving classified emails on her private server and about a million other things cared so much about honesty?
Saturday, December 10, 2016
Nice Fake News Summary
I don't know if the CIA, FBI, et al, will be threatened by an outsider like Trump. I suspect they are sort of like labor unions where the administrators hate Trump but the rank and file love him.
A Boatload Of Jeremiahs
This is all the sweeter for Mike Murphy's appearance at about 10:00. Prior to calling the general election about as wrong as possible, Murphy worked on the Jeb Bush campaign where he famously secured fifth place for his candidate in Iowa at the unheard of cost of $2,884 per vote. He also formulated the ingenious strategy of attacking Christie, Rubio and Kasich, leaving Trump, Cruz and Carson untouched. Somehow, this buffoon commands a seven-figure salary. What a country!
AND THEY LAUGHED AT MISS CLEO
AND THEY LAUGHED AT MISS CLEO
Rethinking Website Advertising
Web monetization has proven to be elusive. Yes, there are success stories, like Facebook, for instance. Some of us believe that FB has jumped the shark but that is another story for another time. Let's talk about website advertising and its obvious shortcomings.
"American Thinker" was once my favorite website. I stopped going there because of the oppressive advertisements that make reading a challenge. It takes a long time to load the page and the simple actions of scrolling and reading become burdensome. Once the page is loaded, we don't just see pages on the right hand column, we also see ads that block the text.
"American Thinker" offers solutions. For $6.79/month we can get ad-free content. This reminds one of cable television and premium channels. Yes you have some good products but it is a big world with oodles of free content. I search dozens of sites every day and I cannot afford to pay for ad-free reading at every (or any) address.
Earlier today I got linked to "American Spectator." A brief article became impossible to read. In a different way, sites like "Forbes" are also a challenge to navigate. I discontinued a couple of email newsletters because the newsletter itself was bogged down with ads that made reading next to impossible.
On a slightly tangential note, why do all the second and third tier sites display the same crappy ads? "You won't believe what this forgotten starlet looks like forty years later!" Nor do we care to know. Maybe if she were not truly forgotten, we might muster some curiosity. I bet she looks older. What do you think?
We might click on a swimwear malfunction link but even then we are misdirected to a slideshow that takes forever to load. Anyone want to clue me in on the dark secret of Tiffany Trump because I do not care enough to wade through the spammage.
A variant of Gresham's Law might be at play where the bad readers chase out the good. Or chase out the many. I don't have a solution at hand. Let's put our thinking caps on. This status quo is not acceptable.
"American Thinker" was once my favorite website. I stopped going there because of the oppressive advertisements that make reading a challenge. It takes a long time to load the page and the simple actions of scrolling and reading become burdensome. Once the page is loaded, we don't just see pages on the right hand column, we also see ads that block the text.
"American Thinker" offers solutions. For $6.79/month we can get ad-free content. This reminds one of cable television and premium channels. Yes you have some good products but it is a big world with oodles of free content. I search dozens of sites every day and I cannot afford to pay for ad-free reading at every (or any) address.
Earlier today I got linked to "American Spectator." A brief article became impossible to read. In a different way, sites like "Forbes" are also a challenge to navigate. I discontinued a couple of email newsletters because the newsletter itself was bogged down with ads that made reading next to impossible.
On a slightly tangential note, why do all the second and third tier sites display the same crappy ads? "You won't believe what this forgotten starlet looks like forty years later!" Nor do we care to know. Maybe if she were not truly forgotten, we might muster some curiosity. I bet she looks older. What do you think?
We might click on a swimwear malfunction link but even then we are misdirected to a slideshow that takes forever to load. Anyone want to clue me in on the dark secret of Tiffany Trump because I do not care enough to wade through the spammage.
A variant of Gresham's Law might be at play where the bad readers chase out the good. Or chase out the many. I don't have a solution at hand. Let's put our thinking caps on. This status quo is not acceptable.
Friday, December 9, 2016
More Surrealism: Brian Williams Denounces Fake News
"WERE YOU SUBJECTED TO GROUND FIRE AT TRUMP TOWER, MR. WILLIAMS?"
Surrealism: Dan Rather Lectures Don Lemon On Ethics Of Journalism
Dan Rather is a luminary in the world of fake news. He saw his cushy job come to an end when he pushed a phony story concerning the National Guard record of then President George W. Bush.
Was Rather complicit in promoting the fake news report or merely negligent? In the court of public opinion he pleaded to the lesser charge and was subsequently honored for a lifetime of service to crooked journalism.
How negligent was Rather? He promoted the validity of a supposedly typewritten document that contained superscript. For those of you who never used a typewriter, superscript was not possible on manual typewriters and even most latter generation electrics did not usually offer that feature.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy .
CNN drags Rather out of the pasture from time to time to get the perspective of a living sage.
"COURAGE. COURAGE. COURAGE."
As bizarre as that might be, the following link is to a Dan Rather correspondence course entitled:
Was Rather complicit in promoting the fake news report or merely negligent? In the court of public opinion he pleaded to the lesser charge and was subsequently honored for a lifetime of service to crooked journalism.
How negligent was Rather? He promoted the validity of a supposedly typewritten document that contained superscript. For those of you who never used a typewriter, superscript was not possible on manual typewriters and even most latter generation electrics did not usually offer that feature.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy .
CNN drags Rather out of the pasture from time to time to get the perspective of a living sage.
"COURAGE. COURAGE. COURAGE."
As bizarre as that might be, the following link is to a Dan Rather correspondence course entitled:
Dan Rather on Journalism & Finding the Truth in the News
I am not making this up. The course was $150 but is now available for $19. Sale ends today! Better hurry.
Thursday, December 8, 2016
DHS, Not Russians, Attempts To Breach Georgia Secretary Of State Firewall
Georgia’s secretary of state has claimed the Department of Homeland Security tried to breach his office’s firewall and has issued a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson asking for an explanation.
Brian Kemp issued a letter to Johnson on Thursday after the state’s third-party cybersecurity provider detected an IP address from the agency’s Southwest D.C. office trying to penetrate the state’s firewall. According to the letter, the attempt was unsuccessful.
The attempt took place on Nov. 15, a few days after the presidential election. The office of the Georgia Secretary of State is responsible for overseeing the state’s elections.
Complete article at CyberScoop
Brian Kemp issued a letter to Johnson on Thursday after the state’s third-party cybersecurity provider detected an IP address from the agency’s Southwest D.C. office trying to penetrate the state’s firewall. According to the letter, the attempt was unsuccessful.
The attempt took place on Nov. 15, a few days after the presidential election. The office of the Georgia Secretary of State is responsible for overseeing the state’s elections.
Complete article at CyberScoop
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
The Fakest News Of All? The Vast Alt-Right Conspiracy
When an habitual liar named Hillary Clinton launched a witch hunt that focused on the "alt-right" this blogger immediately registered suspicion. I immerse myself in this sort of thing and I was entirely unfamiliar with anything called alt-right two decades after the newsgroup faded from the Internet.
Hillary's typical unfounded attacks on "Breitbart News" seemed like something to easily shrug off. Andrew Breitbart was himself Jewish and Jewish writers contribute to Breitbart but these stubborn facts did not prevent charges of anti-Semitism spewing from that evil woman and her sleazy minions. Of course, the MSM parroted the ridiculous Clinton narrative. Recently "The Washington Post" kicked of a "fake news" meme and all the Pravda types followed their lead. The ironacity is that it has been the MSM all along who have been peddling fake news.
I am not familiar with Bruce Bialosky but he contributes to "Town Hall" so he would probably know his way around the parts of the Internet frequented by Conservatives and self-labeled Right Wingers. Bialosky too, was unfamiliar with this fake news sensation.
During the last election campaign all of a sudden I kept hearing about the Alt-Right. Since I thought I was pretty well read and had never heard of them, I considered them to have the same social relevance as a Miley Cyrus song. I decided to investigate this supposed social phenomenon as soon as the election was over and I was done writing about real issues important to the campaign.
I started by sending emails to mainstream Republicans asking them if they knew anyone who considered themselves members of the Alt-Right. The answer was a universal no. Then I sent emails to my friends who consider themselves conservative Republicans. These are people I respect, but I consider a little more hardcore. The answer was again we don’t know any of these people.
I did get one positive response suggesting I contact Jon Fleischman, someone I have known for 20 years, who in the past five years or so has been the California editor for Breitbart. I have also written for Jon’s publication Flashreport.org.
Jon is Jewish and works for Breitbart which has been accused of being anti-Semitic. Jon is a pretty knowledgeable guy -- doing his own publication and working for Breitbart -- but was totally ignorant about the Alt-Right.
Seek and you shall find but you might not find a lot of them. Bialosky's quest in its entirety at "Town Hall."
Fake news is real. Ask the MSM about all the phony polls that had Hillary running the table, including Texas and Utah. The alt-right is also real and both of its members will verify that assertion.
Hillary's typical unfounded attacks on "Breitbart News" seemed like something to easily shrug off. Andrew Breitbart was himself Jewish and Jewish writers contribute to Breitbart but these stubborn facts did not prevent charges of anti-Semitism spewing from that evil woman and her sleazy minions. Of course, the MSM parroted the ridiculous Clinton narrative. Recently "The Washington Post" kicked of a "fake news" meme and all the Pravda types followed their lead. The ironacity is that it has been the MSM all along who have been peddling fake news.
I am not familiar with Bruce Bialosky but he contributes to "Town Hall" so he would probably know his way around the parts of the Internet frequented by Conservatives and self-labeled Right Wingers. Bialosky too, was unfamiliar with this fake news sensation.
During the last election campaign all of a sudden I kept hearing about the Alt-Right. Since I thought I was pretty well read and had never heard of them, I considered them to have the same social relevance as a Miley Cyrus song. I decided to investigate this supposed social phenomenon as soon as the election was over and I was done writing about real issues important to the campaign.
I started by sending emails to mainstream Republicans asking them if they knew anyone who considered themselves members of the Alt-Right. The answer was a universal no. Then I sent emails to my friends who consider themselves conservative Republicans. These are people I respect, but I consider a little more hardcore. The answer was again we don’t know any of these people.
I did get one positive response suggesting I contact Jon Fleischman, someone I have known for 20 years, who in the past five years or so has been the California editor for Breitbart. I have also written for Jon’s publication Flashreport.org.
Jon is Jewish and works for Breitbart which has been accused of being anti-Semitic. Jon is a pretty knowledgeable guy -- doing his own publication and working for Breitbart -- but was totally ignorant about the Alt-Right.
Seek and you shall find but you might not find a lot of them. Bialosky's quest in its entirety at "Town Hall."
Fake news is real. Ask the MSM about all the phony polls that had Hillary running the table, including Texas and Utah. The alt-right is also real and both of its members will verify that assertion.
Monday, December 5, 2016
Sunday, November 27, 2016
Pizzagators: Get A Grip!
If this were a scholarly journal I probably would not use Wikipedia as a source but it's always a good starting point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria
The above references an ugly chapter in American history. In the 1980's a witch hunt mentality resulted in dozens of arrests countrywide for ritualistic child molestation. Almost every single case would eventually be dismissed or overturned, long after the accused were left in ruin.
It was a set of false beliefs that spurred the epidemic of tragic silliness. There was the belief that Satanism was widespread and that this underground religion routinely practiced ritualistic sexual abuse of children. These notions are more folklore than fact. Satanism simply is not popular and if Satanists practice child abuse, it is by no means common.
The final ingredient for the combustion was provided by the dangerous idiots known as mental health professionals. The Catholic Church got in big trouble trusting these charlatans. We can fix your "funny" priests. Send them to us and we will rehabilitate them and safely return them to the community. The mental health industry was on the spot assuring the world that they could recover repressed memories from children of all ages.
The mental health professionals hijacked the powerful imaginations of small children. In one high-profile case, children reported being raped by a lion. Children also identified from a stack of photos, a movie actor as a serial rapist. Said actor had alibis several times over. The esteemed mental health professionals successfully transferred their skills to adult patients, helping many of them recover--or more likely, invent--memories of abuse at the hands of loved ones.
Satanism was widespread but covert.
Satanism routinely involved the sexual abuse of children.
Mental health professionals are at best omniscient and at worst, slightly wrong, but always blameless.
Saltpeter combined with sulfur combined with charcoal meets a spark and BOOM!
Which brings us to Pizzagate. First of all, the fringey types who incorporate the Illuminati into every conversation, come back when you have the names and addresses and org charts of each Illuminati member. Until then, go away!
So too, the fundamentalists who take liberties to connect the dots between a silly ass performance artist, Aliester Crowley, Satanism, crappy graphic art, two trendy posers both named Podesta, and ritualistic child abuse...Go away!
And no, "the elite" and "the privileged" do not molest children as a matter of course.
Not that there are no disturbing Podesta emails. The Temera Luzzatto email where she names the ages of each child and suggests some unusual upcoming events should make your skin crawl. But let us not assume that someone has broken the Podesta code and they know for certain that pizza refers to a young girl, a hot dog refers to a young boy, etc.
I am not a Hillary fan. She is sleazy and she has surrounded herself with sleazeballs. This is not a lone rotten apple situation. These are hardcore criminals. But let's keep things in perspective.
First, let us not bear false witness,
Second, let us not overcharge the accused. We have Hillary accepting millions from the financiers of ISIS, we have pay for play (and vice versa) , intent to violate espionage laws, perjury, obstruction of justice....a good prosecutor could have a field day regardless of what crooked cop Comey might say.
An aside: MSM has done its best to silence Pizzagate discussion. Youtube has aggressively pulled Pizzagate videos. There have been vicious attacks against Pizzagators like David Seaman. There is definitely a backlash.
It is no crime to speak in code. And I wish to avoid bearing false witness and more importantly, I wish to avoid litigation. Having said that, there is some suspicious behavior going on here. Let us not jump to conclusions. The sensational can eclipse the mundane. The sensational can also eclipse the obvious. Please, Pizzagators, proceed with caution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria
The above references an ugly chapter in American history. In the 1980's a witch hunt mentality resulted in dozens of arrests countrywide for ritualistic child molestation. Almost every single case would eventually be dismissed or overturned, long after the accused were left in ruin.
It was a set of false beliefs that spurred the epidemic of tragic silliness. There was the belief that Satanism was widespread and that this underground religion routinely practiced ritualistic sexual abuse of children. These notions are more folklore than fact. Satanism simply is not popular and if Satanists practice child abuse, it is by no means common.
The final ingredient for the combustion was provided by the dangerous idiots known as mental health professionals. The Catholic Church got in big trouble trusting these charlatans. We can fix your "funny" priests. Send them to us and we will rehabilitate them and safely return them to the community. The mental health industry was on the spot assuring the world that they could recover repressed memories from children of all ages.
The mental health professionals hijacked the powerful imaginations of small children. In one high-profile case, children reported being raped by a lion. Children also identified from a stack of photos, a movie actor as a serial rapist. Said actor had alibis several times over. The esteemed mental health professionals successfully transferred their skills to adult patients, helping many of them recover--or more likely, invent--memories of abuse at the hands of loved ones.
Satanism was widespread but covert.
Satanism routinely involved the sexual abuse of children.
Mental health professionals are at best omniscient and at worst, slightly wrong, but always blameless.
Saltpeter combined with sulfur combined with charcoal meets a spark and BOOM!
Which brings us to Pizzagate. First of all, the fringey types who incorporate the Illuminati into every conversation, come back when you have the names and addresses and org charts of each Illuminati member. Until then, go away!
So too, the fundamentalists who take liberties to connect the dots between a silly ass performance artist, Aliester Crowley, Satanism, crappy graphic art, two trendy posers both named Podesta, and ritualistic child abuse...Go away!
And no, "the elite" and "the privileged" do not molest children as a matter of course.
Not that there are no disturbing Podesta emails. The Temera Luzzatto email where she names the ages of each child and suggests some unusual upcoming events should make your skin crawl. But let us not assume that someone has broken the Podesta code and they know for certain that pizza refers to a young girl, a hot dog refers to a young boy, etc.
I am not a Hillary fan. She is sleazy and she has surrounded herself with sleazeballs. This is not a lone rotten apple situation. These are hardcore criminals. But let's keep things in perspective.
First, let us not bear false witness,
Second, let us not overcharge the accused. We have Hillary accepting millions from the financiers of ISIS, we have pay for play (and vice versa) , intent to violate espionage laws, perjury, obstruction of justice....a good prosecutor could have a field day regardless of what crooked cop Comey might say.
An aside: MSM has done its best to silence Pizzagate discussion. Youtube has aggressively pulled Pizzagate videos. There have been vicious attacks against Pizzagators like David Seaman. There is definitely a backlash.
It is no crime to speak in code. And I wish to avoid bearing false witness and more importantly, I wish to avoid litigation. Having said that, there is some suspicious behavior going on here. Let us not jump to conclusions. The sensational can eclipse the mundane. The sensational can also eclipse the obvious. Please, Pizzagators, proceed with caution.
Saturday, November 26, 2016
Are Hillary And Company Still Trying To Steal The Election?
In the words of Sarah Palin, "You betcha."
Funny that Hillary's minions have demanded a recount in three hotbeds of voter fraud: Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. Do not be surprised if new paper ballots are found in Milwaukee, Philadelphia and Detroit.
Hey Priebus, don't order your new desk just yet. These are the Clintons!
Funny that Hillary's minions have demanded a recount in three hotbeds of voter fraud: Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. Do not be surprised if new paper ballots are found in Milwaukee, Philadelphia and Detroit.
Hey Priebus, don't order your new desk just yet. These are the Clintons!
Thursday, November 24, 2016
Happy Thanksgiving On What Might Be Our Best Ever
A man I begrudgingly grew to respect over the years is Rudy Giuliani. New Yorkers tell me that when he became mayor, the citizens instantly saw and felt a positive transformation. The porn shops were replaced by things like Disney Stores. Harlem went from Beirut to Yuppieville in a few short years. Thugs were relocated upstate. Monuments were restored and thereafter protected. Forget about defecating or sleeping in Battery Park and if you get caught vandalizing a shrine you will wish that you had performed your dastardly deed in a liberal enclave like Nebraska or Mississippi. Rudy ushered in a New York Renaissance that continues to this day.
Donald Trump has not even taken office and our spirits are rising. We sense that things might just get batter this time around. Maybe, just maybe, the swamp, the fetid, sewage-laden swamp, will finally get drained. Gestapo wannabes of the Lois Lerner variety will be sent packing. So too, the Jonathan Grubers, the James Comeys, The Loretta Lynchs...oh let's not ruin our appetites on this glorious day.
We prayed for a leader. A leader was given to us. Let us all be thankful. Happy Thanksgiving!
Donald Trump has not even taken office and our spirits are rising. We sense that things might just get batter this time around. Maybe, just maybe, the swamp, the fetid, sewage-laden swamp, will finally get drained. Gestapo wannabes of the Lois Lerner variety will be sent packing. So too, the Jonathan Grubers, the James Comeys, The Loretta Lynchs...oh let's not ruin our appetites on this glorious day.
We prayed for a leader. A leader was given to us. Let us all be thankful. Happy Thanksgiving!
Wednesday, November 23, 2016
Is The Honeymoon Over And Do We Need A Tea Party 3.0?
Remember the Tea Party? It was formed virtually overnight almost eight years ago as a reaction to the overreach and overspending by both political parties. It could have taken root in either major party or neither but as it was, Obama and company were overtly hostile to the movement and the slippery Republicans paid lip service to the disaffected and welcomed them with slimy arms and cold steel daggers hidden beneath their oily cloaks.
A lot has changed since then, most notably the national debt which more or less doubled from about $10 trillion to around $20 trillion. That is significant. Barack Obama will lose a lot of ground but the he won the war of the debt. We will feel his influence for decades to come.
For better or worse, Obama has prevented his successors from getting too creative with finances. It's all been spent, so forget about it. Or so we thought. Now we are hearing about an infrastructure (isn't that what we used to call pork?) bill with a trillion dollar price tag? Didn't the Dems already do something like that in 2009? What do we have to show for it?
It is my viewpoint, and I hope Tea Partiers concur, that the national debt represents a greater problem than crumbling bridges. Even if I am wrong in my assessment, is it not the responsibility of state and local governments to repair their worn out structures?
Profligate spending is profligate pending regardless of who might hold the credit card. For once, can't we have a president who is on our side? Is the honeymoon over already?
Name Change
The Worldsbiggestloser has gone into retirement.
The tongue in cheek self-deprecation no longer serves me.
On a cosmic, law of attraction/self-actualization theme, I don't think it's beneficial to refer to oneself as a loser.
I adopted the original moniker in a period of despair. In every fact of life, things were going poorly. My state of mind has not generally been dependent on shifting political winds. When I was already in a funk, the Obama phenomenon pushed me to despair. It is still demoralizing to witness people whom I have respected all my life go Jonestown for a silly, vapid caricature of a Leftist politician. The Kool-Aid has gotten sweeter over time, or so it seems from a non-guzzler.
I never liked politics but somehow I fell through that looking glass. Barack Obama is more frightening now than he was eight years ago. He remains our only unvetted president. That is perfectly A-OK with his goose steppy followers. For the rest of us, it is creepy. It is Jonestown creepy. It is Body Snatcher creepy. It is Walking Dead Creepy. It is Obotomy Creepy. As with Alzheimer patients, Obama worshipers are the people we once loved, but they are not the people we once loved. Be kind and loving and don't rearrange the furniture more than you have to.
BOSurvivor supplants Worldsbiggestloser. The loser has accrued a few personal and political victories in the last eight years. Surviving the stench of BO is not a trifling matter. We endured gaslighting, brainwashing, thought control and the constant, constant, constant charges of bigotry. If we tried, we could never concoct a storm of hate speech to match the quantity and toxic quality of the hate Obama's acolytes have spewed at us. We have survived and we have prevailed.
We can pile on when it comes to the deficiencies, abuses and widespread corruption of the Obama Administration. We will be paying off the national debt for the rest of our lives at the tune of six figures per taxpayer. Those material things might be easier to forgive than the damage Barack Obama inflicted on the spirit of America.
We are a hopelessly divided nation. The reason for the great chasm is the Democratic Party's adoption of the Alinsky playbook. The Obama Administration made Alinsky mainstream. It is now the norm for the compassion-loving Left.
Saul Alinsky advocated the shunning of rational discourse and rejected the very premise of truth. Attacks should be personal. Obama's minions took his message to heart and every disagreement with a not-great-by-any-standards president was based on racism. Hillary Clinton, also a student of Alinsky, expanded on the strategy, maliciously attacking friends and associates of a deceased Jewish man named Andrew Breitbart for being anti-Semitic. She also coined the term Basket of Deplorables, and did all she could to falsely link her opponent to white supremacists.
Hillary Clinton might have expanded on the Alinsky model but it was Barack Obama who brought the chronic petty bitterness into the mainstream. It wasn't radio shock jocks with references to bodily functions who coarsened our culture. That distinction belongs to Barack Obama and his thuggish followers. The noxious miasma of BO will linger long after he has gone (assuming he goes) but we will muddle through the ordeal.
We survived BO. I survived BO. That is something to celebrate. Hello BOSurvivor.
The tongue in cheek self-deprecation no longer serves me.
On a cosmic, law of attraction/self-actualization theme, I don't think it's beneficial to refer to oneself as a loser.
I adopted the original moniker in a period of despair. In every fact of life, things were going poorly. My state of mind has not generally been dependent on shifting political winds. When I was already in a funk, the Obama phenomenon pushed me to despair. It is still demoralizing to witness people whom I have respected all my life go Jonestown for a silly, vapid caricature of a Leftist politician. The Kool-Aid has gotten sweeter over time, or so it seems from a non-guzzler.
I never liked politics but somehow I fell through that looking glass. Barack Obama is more frightening now than he was eight years ago. He remains our only unvetted president. That is perfectly A-OK with his goose steppy followers. For the rest of us, it is creepy. It is Jonestown creepy. It is Body Snatcher creepy. It is Walking Dead Creepy. It is Obotomy Creepy. As with Alzheimer patients, Obama worshipers are the people we once loved, but they are not the people we once loved. Be kind and loving and don't rearrange the furniture more than you have to.
BOSurvivor supplants Worldsbiggestloser. The loser has accrued a few personal and political victories in the last eight years. Surviving the stench of BO is not a trifling matter. We endured gaslighting, brainwashing, thought control and the constant, constant, constant charges of bigotry. If we tried, we could never concoct a storm of hate speech to match the quantity and toxic quality of the hate Obama's acolytes have spewed at us. We have survived and we have prevailed.
We can pile on when it comes to the deficiencies, abuses and widespread corruption of the Obama Administration. We will be paying off the national debt for the rest of our lives at the tune of six figures per taxpayer. Those material things might be easier to forgive than the damage Barack Obama inflicted on the spirit of America.
We are a hopelessly divided nation. The reason for the great chasm is the Democratic Party's adoption of the Alinsky playbook. The Obama Administration made Alinsky mainstream. It is now the norm for the compassion-loving Left.
Saul Alinsky advocated the shunning of rational discourse and rejected the very premise of truth. Attacks should be personal. Obama's minions took his message to heart and every disagreement with a not-great-by-any-standards president was based on racism. Hillary Clinton, also a student of Alinsky, expanded on the strategy, maliciously attacking friends and associates of a deceased Jewish man named Andrew Breitbart for being anti-Semitic. She also coined the term Basket of Deplorables, and did all she could to falsely link her opponent to white supremacists.
Hillary Clinton might have expanded on the Alinsky model but it was Barack Obama who brought the chronic petty bitterness into the mainstream. It wasn't radio shock jocks with references to bodily functions who coarsened our culture. That distinction belongs to Barack Obama and his thuggish followers. The noxious miasma of BO will linger long after he has gone (assuming he goes) but we will muddle through the ordeal.
We survived BO. I survived BO. That is something to celebrate. Hello BOSurvivor.
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Monday, November 21, 2016
Pizzagate Once More
Hillary and her inner circle are evil, that is hard to deny. Still, I would caution against jumping to conclusions about Pizzagate.
There are a few emails that specifically discuss children and I think those should be followed up by local authorities. But all the codespeak about pizza and pasta and other food items might have a different, if not innocent, connotation.
There is the distinct possibility that food references concern narcotics. Illicit drug consumption is certainly more popular than pedophilia and the law of averages might muscle in on this. Given the number of people referenced, the odds are good that at least a few of the people mentioned might be consuming something in secret. I am not trying to spread a counter-rumor but narcotic consumption would be more likely than the conclusion others have jumped to.
I am also skeptical of the number of women who are linked to this rumor campaign. Pedophilia is still largely a male activity despite the emergence of public school teachers with an appetite for adolescent boys. Those stories make the national news but women have a lot of catching up to do, if that is their objective. On the other hand, women consume licit and illicit drugs at about the same rate as men.
Tunnels and secret rooms might facilitate the consumption of non-food items. At least two of the people mentioned are notorious for their mood swings and erratic behavior. That might be more indicative of drug consumption than sexual perversion.
It is conceivable that the codespeak involves something perfectly legal but not something political strategists want to share with the outside world. Just in case one's emails fell into the hands of say, Julian Assange. Google is pulling Pizzagate vids from Youtube and that might just be to protect themselves from lawsuits. Or it might indicate something more sinister.
For now, Pizzagate is not going away. #PIZZAGATE: 7 Bizarre Factoids Even the Most Skeptical Should Know
There are a few emails that specifically discuss children and I think those should be followed up by local authorities. But all the codespeak about pizza and pasta and other food items might have a different, if not innocent, connotation.
There is the distinct possibility that food references concern narcotics. Illicit drug consumption is certainly more popular than pedophilia and the law of averages might muscle in on this. Given the number of people referenced, the odds are good that at least a few of the people mentioned might be consuming something in secret. I am not trying to spread a counter-rumor but narcotic consumption would be more likely than the conclusion others have jumped to.
I am also skeptical of the number of women who are linked to this rumor campaign. Pedophilia is still largely a male activity despite the emergence of public school teachers with an appetite for adolescent boys. Those stories make the national news but women have a lot of catching up to do, if that is their objective. On the other hand, women consume licit and illicit drugs at about the same rate as men.
Tunnels and secret rooms might facilitate the consumption of non-food items. At least two of the people mentioned are notorious for their mood swings and erratic behavior. That might be more indicative of drug consumption than sexual perversion.
It is conceivable that the codespeak involves something perfectly legal but not something political strategists want to share with the outside world. Just in case one's emails fell into the hands of say, Julian Assange. Google is pulling Pizzagate vids from Youtube and that might just be to protect themselves from lawsuits. Or it might indicate something more sinister.
For now, Pizzagate is not going away. #PIZZAGATE: 7 Bizarre Factoids Even the Most Skeptical Should Know
Priceless: Guru Nate Silver Speaks At MoMath and Parrots His Hillary 85 % Prediction
I GUESS IF YOU CAN'T GET A CHIMP AND A DARTBOARD...
Sunday, November 20, 2016
Is Pizzagate For Real?
I thought the innuendo involving the Clintons and child trafficking/child abuse, etc., was a little too sensational. Assange already exposed Hillary and her fellow gangsters for dozens and dozens of serious crimes, including bribery from the financiers of ISIS (by Hillary's own admission). The evidence for espionage and influence peddling, perjury and obstruction of justice is overwhelming. Slam dunk in basketball lingo. We don't need to jump to wild conclusions about what might be code speak.
Having said that, though, I did previously post that one of these emails should have been investigated by local authorities. That is still my position but I have not followed the Pizzagate chatter any further. David Seaman is a little more grounded than say, Alex Jones. I like Alex Jones and let's face it, he was more honest and accurate than the MSM for the duration of the election cycle, but he is not known for his skepticism either. David Seaman voicing this opinion makes me sit up and take notice.
I hope Pizzagate is bogus but let's keep an open mind on the subject.
DAVID SEAMAN
Having said that, though, I did previously post that one of these emails should have been investigated by local authorities. That is still my position but I have not followed the Pizzagate chatter any further. David Seaman is a little more grounded than say, Alex Jones. I like Alex Jones and let's face it, he was more honest and accurate than the MSM for the duration of the election cycle, but he is not known for his skepticism either. David Seaman voicing this opinion makes me sit up and take notice.
I hope Pizzagate is bogus but let's keep an open mind on the subject.
DAVID SEAMAN
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Judicial Watch Does It Again
It's not looking good for the Lerner Gang. The Cincinnati IRS field office targeted non-profit groups by party affiliation. They IRS managed to slow walk these FOIA requests until after election day.
On a related note, if you can find a bookie to take your action, Loretta Lynch will NOT be retained but Donald Trump. If you can't find a bookie, Nate Silver or Larry Sabato or Karl Rove will probably cover you. Not sure what Silver has rated Which means Cincinnati could become indictment central for the biggest and most suppressed political scandal in American history.
Judicial Watch does it again.
On a related note, if you can find a bookie to take your action, Loretta Lynch will NOT be retained but Donald Trump. If you can't find a bookie, Nate Silver or Larry Sabato or Karl Rove will probably cover you. Not sure what Silver has rated Which means Cincinnati could become indictment central for the biggest and most suppressed political scandal in American history.
Judicial Watch does it again.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Monday, November 14, 2016
Oh,By The Way, Deep Blue Vermont Just Elected A Republican Governor
Is it Trump's coattails? A whitelash? One more nail in the Democrat coffin hammered by Barack Obama?
Phil Scott, a construction worker, contractor, legislator and minor league auto racer defeated Sue Minter in last week's gubernatorial election.
The hits just keep on coming.
Phil Scott, a construction worker, contractor, legislator and minor league auto racer defeated Sue Minter in last week's gubernatorial election.
The hits just keep on coming.
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Donald Trump Is A Joke
AND A DAMN FUNNY ONE TOO, I MIGHT ADD
Drudge posted this and I am behind the curve but who cares?
Drudge posted this and I am behind the curve but who cares?
The Unusually High Stakes In 2016
We seem to be headed for one-party rule. Whichever team lost last Tuesday was set to lose more than an election. Their very existence was in question.
Had Hillary won the presidency, the GOP would have found itself on the scrap heap of history. Who could have unified the party after the disgraceful displays of treachery on behalf of the Never-Trumpers? Ben Sasse? Lindsey Graham? William Kristol? It would be a pup tent of a political machine but the point would be moot. Hillary would have institutionalized voter fraud on a scale that would make America Chicago en route to Detroit. Bye bye GOP. Bye bye America.
Ah, but the pundits and pollsters were as accurate about Donald Trump as they were about Brexit. In polite terms, the experts buried their heads up their asses and reported on what they saw. I for one look forward to rubbing salt in the wounds of the fork-tongued pundit class for years to come.
Had the Democrats won, the influx of millions of immigrant gangsters and terrorists herded by the Scott Fovals and James Creamers would have spelled the literal demise of the Republic that was long ago handed to us. Game over. The End. Drop the curtain. Roll the credits. Fortunately, Donald Trump delivered us from the barbarians. In so doing, he prompted the question, "what now for the Democratic Party?"
A book I wanted to write but will go unwritten is "Barack Obama:The Man Who Destroyed The Democratic Party." Hardcore Democrats are not like the rest of us and please do not insert Hemingway's comment to Fitzgerald here. Our differences go well beyond the guns vs, butter arguments. Most Americans put God first and either family or country second. Political parties are but vehicles for delivering their agenda.
Democrats do not share that outlook. It is party first and last and God, country, etc., are afterthoughts. They like their families in a political nepotism kind of way but only so long as their kin are loyal to the party.
You might have noticed that for eight years, valid criticism of the Obama Agenda was met with indifference, ridicule and the obligatory charge of racism. Democrats did not give a damn about the catastrophic debt, sluggish economic growth, the fate of Appalachia, the welfare of rural Americans, the hardships of working (and formerly working before they got shuffled to the unemployment line) people, the insensitive cruelties of Obamacare, the decline of America's military, the weaponization of federal bureaucracy turned against critics and dissenters, the ongoing graft and corruption, widespread voter fraud...
The party of conspicuous compassion loves to thumb its nose at anyone and everyone who cannot be used a political pawn. No exceptions. I am not getting off track here. The significant points are:
1. The Democratic Party is in deep trouble.
2. The person most responsible for the patient finding itself on life support is Barack Obama. His capacity for destruction cannot be under emphasized. This guy is the Anti-Midas. Through his weird alchemy, everything Obama touches turns to shit.
3. Where does the party go from here?
Let's start with the first point. If President Trump turns his justified furor to illegal immigration and voter fraud (the two are interconnected. The Dems facilitated illegal immigration to promote voter fraud) the Dems will lose their clout in several states. A Trump DOJ might convene grand juries where voter fraud is evident and it will be a bad era for the Fovals and the Creamers as well as their electoral beneficiaries.
George Soros will not live forever and even if he does he might face racketeering charges and civil suits for his ongoing Astroturf riots. The family of a slain Dallas police officer has already filed suit against the spooky dude and more will follow. Soros has jumped the shark.
The other oligarchs might pick up the slack for the Dems--Bloomberg, Steyer, Buffet, Cuban, Zuckerberg, Bezos, the Rothschilds to name but a few--but this past election might have a sobering effect on political donations. Hillary outspent Trump 4 to 1 and lost. As well, The Clinton Foundation, a clearing house of graft and corruption has been rendered irrelevant by Hillary's defeat.
The fat cats might be willing to fund a rising star but we see more setting suns than ascendants.
Addressing point #2, until the Democrats acknowledge Obama's dismantling of the Democratic Party, they will live in a land of delusion. Going into last Tuesday's election, The Democrats had lost 12 governorships, 13 Senate seats, 69 Congressional seats and over 900 state legislature slots under Obama. They picked up 2 Congressional seats, 2 Senate seats (the GOP was defending 24 positions) but lost the White House, yet another governor's office, and even more state legislators, enough to turn both Kentucky and Minnesota deep red.
Obama also destroyed the Clinton Machine, the heart and soul of the Democratic Party. Can the Jonestown crew ever see Obama for what he is? I doubt it. The Kool-Aid is just too sweet and to even broach the subject is to invite the race card that was wielded so impulsively against even the gentlest and most even-handed of Obama's critics. Hopee Changee forever.
Where do the Democrats go from here? They still have the news media, Wall Street, Hollywood, TV, Silicon Valley, social media, the oligarchs and the fat cats on their side. Will that translate into political success? I doubt it. What will their motto be? The Party Of The Rich And Famous And The Dupes Who Suck Up To Them? Insert Howard Dean scream here. Not sure that will rock the Evangelical crowd.
The Dems could swing back into power with Republican ineptitude or corruption. But even then, they will need a superstar candidate as in 92 and 08. When you lose hundreds of seats at every level, it limits your options. Tammy Duckworth, Corey Booker, Andrew Cuomo, and John Hickenlooper all show promise but none of them have expressed an interest in the presidency just yet.
Who has expressed in interest in the presidency? Bernie Sanders, who will be 78 in 2020. Michelle Obama, who has never held any public office and seems to be uncomfortable in front of a camera. Mark Cuban has intimated that someday he might like the job and he could be emboldened by Trump's success.
One thing the Dems have in their favor is the grim economic outlook. We will probably see stock market and real estate corrections that will dwarf 2008. They will be brought on by the policies of Obama/Yellen but Barry will be out of office when the debt hits the fan. Got to give them credit for keeping the plates in the air as long as they did.
The media will reflexively blame Trump for anything that will go wrong and there are a lot of dupes who will swallow it, hook, line and sinker. How the Republicans deal with the next major event might decide the welfare of our country for a long time to come. Until an unwasted crisis emerges, it looks mighty grim for the Democrats.
Had Hillary won the presidency, the GOP would have found itself on the scrap heap of history. Who could have unified the party after the disgraceful displays of treachery on behalf of the Never-Trumpers? Ben Sasse? Lindsey Graham? William Kristol? It would be a pup tent of a political machine but the point would be moot. Hillary would have institutionalized voter fraud on a scale that would make America Chicago en route to Detroit. Bye bye GOP. Bye bye America.
Ah, but the pundits and pollsters were as accurate about Donald Trump as they were about Brexit. In polite terms, the experts buried their heads up their asses and reported on what they saw. I for one look forward to rubbing salt in the wounds of the fork-tongued pundit class for years to come.
Had the Democrats won, the influx of millions of immigrant gangsters and terrorists herded by the Scott Fovals and James Creamers would have spelled the literal demise of the Republic that was long ago handed to us. Game over. The End. Drop the curtain. Roll the credits. Fortunately, Donald Trump delivered us from the barbarians. In so doing, he prompted the question, "what now for the Democratic Party?"
A book I wanted to write but will go unwritten is "Barack Obama:The Man Who Destroyed The Democratic Party." Hardcore Democrats are not like the rest of us and please do not insert Hemingway's comment to Fitzgerald here. Our differences go well beyond the guns vs, butter arguments. Most Americans put God first and either family or country second. Political parties are but vehicles for delivering their agenda.
Democrats do not share that outlook. It is party first and last and God, country, etc., are afterthoughts. They like their families in a political nepotism kind of way but only so long as their kin are loyal to the party.
You might have noticed that for eight years, valid criticism of the Obama Agenda was met with indifference, ridicule and the obligatory charge of racism. Democrats did not give a damn about the catastrophic debt, sluggish economic growth, the fate of Appalachia, the welfare of rural Americans, the hardships of working (and formerly working before they got shuffled to the unemployment line) people, the insensitive cruelties of Obamacare, the decline of America's military, the weaponization of federal bureaucracy turned against critics and dissenters, the ongoing graft and corruption, widespread voter fraud...
The party of conspicuous compassion loves to thumb its nose at anyone and everyone who cannot be used a political pawn. No exceptions. I am not getting off track here. The significant points are:
1. The Democratic Party is in deep trouble.
2. The person most responsible for the patient finding itself on life support is Barack Obama. His capacity for destruction cannot be under emphasized. This guy is the Anti-Midas. Through his weird alchemy, everything Obama touches turns to shit.
3. Where does the party go from here?
Let's start with the first point. If President Trump turns his justified furor to illegal immigration and voter fraud (the two are interconnected. The Dems facilitated illegal immigration to promote voter fraud) the Dems will lose their clout in several states. A Trump DOJ might convene grand juries where voter fraud is evident and it will be a bad era for the Fovals and the Creamers as well as their electoral beneficiaries.
George Soros will not live forever and even if he does he might face racketeering charges and civil suits for his ongoing Astroturf riots. The family of a slain Dallas police officer has already filed suit against the spooky dude and more will follow. Soros has jumped the shark.
The other oligarchs might pick up the slack for the Dems--Bloomberg, Steyer, Buffet, Cuban, Zuckerberg, Bezos, the Rothschilds to name but a few--but this past election might have a sobering effect on political donations. Hillary outspent Trump 4 to 1 and lost. As well, The Clinton Foundation, a clearing house of graft and corruption has been rendered irrelevant by Hillary's defeat.
The fat cats might be willing to fund a rising star but we see more setting suns than ascendants.
Addressing point #2, until the Democrats acknowledge Obama's dismantling of the Democratic Party, they will live in a land of delusion. Going into last Tuesday's election, The Democrats had lost 12 governorships, 13 Senate seats, 69 Congressional seats and over 900 state legislature slots under Obama. They picked up 2 Congressional seats, 2 Senate seats (the GOP was defending 24 positions) but lost the White House, yet another governor's office, and even more state legislators, enough to turn both Kentucky and Minnesota deep red.
Obama also destroyed the Clinton Machine, the heart and soul of the Democratic Party. Can the Jonestown crew ever see Obama for what he is? I doubt it. The Kool-Aid is just too sweet and to even broach the subject is to invite the race card that was wielded so impulsively against even the gentlest and most even-handed of Obama's critics. Hopee Changee forever.
Where do the Democrats go from here? They still have the news media, Wall Street, Hollywood, TV, Silicon Valley, social media, the oligarchs and the fat cats on their side. Will that translate into political success? I doubt it. What will their motto be? The Party Of The Rich And Famous And The Dupes Who Suck Up To Them? Insert Howard Dean scream here. Not sure that will rock the Evangelical crowd.
The Dems could swing back into power with Republican ineptitude or corruption. But even then, they will need a superstar candidate as in 92 and 08. When you lose hundreds of seats at every level, it limits your options. Tammy Duckworth, Corey Booker, Andrew Cuomo, and John Hickenlooper all show promise but none of them have expressed an interest in the presidency just yet.
Who has expressed in interest in the presidency? Bernie Sanders, who will be 78 in 2020. Michelle Obama, who has never held any public office and seems to be uncomfortable in front of a camera. Mark Cuban has intimated that someday he might like the job and he could be emboldened by Trump's success.
One thing the Dems have in their favor is the grim economic outlook. We will probably see stock market and real estate corrections that will dwarf 2008. They will be brought on by the policies of Obama/Yellen but Barry will be out of office when the debt hits the fan. Got to give them credit for keeping the plates in the air as long as they did.
The media will reflexively blame Trump for anything that will go wrong and there are a lot of dupes who will swallow it, hook, line and sinker. How the Republicans deal with the next major event might decide the welfare of our country for a long time to come. Until an unwasted crisis emerges, it looks mighty grim for the Democrats.
Saturday, November 12, 2016
BB. Before Barack...AB. After Barack
This is edited. As I recall, Lee was even more obnoxious. He is prophetic in a strange kind of way. We might refer to BB and AB with a certain historical significance. The DB--During Barack--recalling his eight-year reign of terror will be hard to forget, no matter how hard we try.
Friday, November 11, 2016
Trump Coattails
Don't look now but the Kentucky legislature is now controlled by Republicans. First time in over a hundred years,
I am told.
Oh, and by the way, Republicans took control of both houses of Minnesota. Yes, Minnesota.
Am I The Only Jerk Who Missed Out On The Gift Of Prophecy?
Thursday, November 10, 2016
CNN outs themselves by using their own cameramen as fake protester.
NOT THAT THEIR REPUTATION CAN FALL MUCH FARTHER
Donald Trump Did The Impossible: He Made Watching PBS Fun
I don't expect anyone to watch all nine hours of this. The only time I can watch PBS, CNN, MSNBC, or any network or listen to NPR is when things go bad for the establishment. November 8 was one such evening.
I switched to PBS after the sun was setting on Hillary and I will confess to some schadenfreude. Scroll through and observe the changes in voice, facial expressions and body language as the inevitable is realized. They go from almost giddy to downright mournful and you can fast forward through the nauseating parts.
I wanted to include a few highlights but....this is PBS. Who cares? I will make note that at around 8:19:xx to 8:20:xx they repeat the now discredited falsehood that Russia has interfered with our election.
There are some gold nuggets here if you are willing to sift through the sand. What a wonderful evening.
The Demise Of Kelly Ayotte
I posted something a couple of months ago that questioned the instincts of certain GOP Senators: September 13, if you want to check the archives. I listed Ayotte, Johnson and Kirk as three senators who just do not have the feel for politics,
Johnson got on the Trump Train and was re-elected. Kirk and Ayotte on the other hand, will be spending more time with their families. Whereas Kirk ran against a strong candidate--one of the few, if only, rising stars in the Democratic Party--in a deep blue state, Ayotte ran against a flawed governor in a purplish state.
The turning point for Ayotte was a debate with governor Hassan where the moderator asked the Senator if Donald Trump was a good "role model." Forget the psychobabble baby talk for a heartbeat. The Senator hemmed and hawed and served up some blather. She could have said something like, "He's a far better role model than the habitual criminal at the top of the Democratic ticket who has already accepted hundreds in millions in bribes from Gulf States including countries she herself has identified as states who fund ISIS ..."
The point is, the question was a hanging curve ball that could have been put over the left field fence, the right field fence or deep, deep center. Kelly popped it up to the catcher.
Ayotte refused multiple requests to appear on "The Howie Carr Show." That in and of itself would have been worth a thousand or so votes, her margin of defeat. A token of respect for Donald Trump might have put her over the top. We will never know. What we do know is that politics is not for everyone. Kelly Ayotte is one such person.
Blaze This: Never-Trumpers Set A Weekly Standard For Irrelevance
Thanks to all the Never-Trumpers who helped us overturn the Obama agenda and who prevented the White House from being occupied by corrupt espionage artists who have accepted millions in bribes from ISIS financiers!
Oh, you sat this one out? We did it without you? You were working for the other side?
We sure could have used your help but shilling for Soros is a full-time job and we of feeble mind cannot understand your highly sophisticated motives. Hope President-Elect Clinton sends you flowers for all that you did for her campaign.
Sorry to bother you. Get back to your cruise ship.
Oh, you sat this one out? We did it without you? You were working for the other side?
We sure could have used your help but shilling for Soros is a full-time job and we of feeble mind cannot understand your highly sophisticated motives. Hope President-Elect Clinton sends you flowers for all that you did for her campaign.
Sorry to bother you. Get back to your cruise ship.
Most Fertile Caption Contest Ever
Cruise the high seas with an endless parade of Never-Trump speakers such as William Kristol. and no kidding, Erick Erickson.
Portrait Of A Winner From City Journal
Trump’s skill must also be evaluated against the backdrop of the incredibly hostile environment he faced. Start with the almost-unanimous rejection of Trump by the American elite (at least publicly). Not a single Fortune 100 CEObacked Trump. Of the top 100 newspapers in America, only two—in small-market Las Vegas and Jacksonville—endorsed Trump. As of the end of September, Hillary Clinton was outraising Trump 20-1 in donations from billionaires.
City Journal
City Journal
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
Will Nate Silver Come Out Of The Idiot Closet?
Or is that even necessary at this point?
CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS GUY DOES THIS FOR A LIVING?
DIDN'T YOU WRITE "THE COMPLETE IDIOT'S GUIDE TO IDIOCY?"
OH, IT'S NOT FOOLPROOF?
TRUMP SHOULD TURN OFF THE LIGHTS AT HIS HEADQUARTERS
DAMN! I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLT ONE WHO KNEW SILVER WAS AN IDIOT
THE COMMENTS ARE EVEN HARSHER THAN THAT TEENAGE CENK
SO,LIKE YOU USED TO BE SMART? I REST MY CASE
CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS GUY DOES THIS FOR A LIVING?
DIDN'T YOU WRITE "THE COMPLETE IDIOT'S GUIDE TO IDIOCY?"
OH, IT'S NOT FOOLPROOF?
TRUMP SHOULD TURN OFF THE LIGHTS AT HIS HEADQUARTERS
DAMN! I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLT ONE WHO KNEW SILVER WAS AN IDIOT
THE COMMENTS ARE EVEN HARSHER THAN THAT TEENAGE CENK
SO,LIKE YOU USED TO BE SMART? I REST MY CASE
Hey Sabato, That Crystal Ball Might Be Getting A Bit Cloudy
IS THERE AN ORACLE IN THE HOUSE?
IN FAIRNESS, HE DOES ADMIT THAT HE IS A HIGHLY PAID BUFFOON
IN FAIRNESS, HE DOES ADMIT THAT HE IS A HIGHLY PAID BUFFOON
Congratulations Donald J. Trump
There is much to be said. Life has once more reminded me that life is life. I am fully aware that the preceding was a nonsensical sentence but I do have to attend a wake this evening and I have to replenish the fridge and the cupboard and I have about a dozen unrelated tasks that have been put on a back burner and then another burner and then another. And I stayed up much too late last night.
Let us savor this moment as best we can. Congratulations, Donald John Trump. You are a champion of the forgotten. God Bless America!
Let us savor this moment as best we can. Congratulations, Donald John Trump. You are a champion of the forgotten. God Bless America!
Tuesday, November 8, 2016
View From New Hampshire
I wanted to be there when the polls opened and I am glad that I was tardy. I overheard snippets that the parking lot was jammed and lines were formed by 6:45.
When I finally rolled in around 7:20 there was already a traffic jam exiting the parking lot. Voting took place at the old high school gym and it is a good sized structure, usually sufficient for the task at hand. The place was packed and the line extended outdoors.
In New Hampshire you can register to vote on election day. That line was huge. It might be dangerous to speculate on the composition of these people but I am going to take a couple of educated guesses. I don't think Hillary will bring many new voters to the polls.The unregistered voters were likely either Trumpsters or fraudsters.
Fraudsters like to practice their craft later in the day. They tend to be night owls who wake up when the sun gets warm. They might need a nip or a toke to endure the adversity of standing and waiting and eventually filling in a ballot. The weather is clear but cold today and the brisk air might keep some of them indoors. We will see.
I think the long lines at the registration table were mostly first time voters who came out to vote for Donald Trump. You can sometimes tell at a glance if a person has ever done a day's work and I would say that most of these people are guilty of practicing that age old vice. They might not be employed as we speak but one gets the impression that they would love to tell you all about their new job sometime in the future. Anyone who gets up at dawn and who endures cold temperatures, traffic and long lines to vote can be sorted in the "motivated" file. Draw from these observations whatever conclusion you might. As for me, I don't think they are on hand with the chirping birds to elect our first female president.
Meanwhile, my heart is racing. I am jumpy and a little bit distracted. A few days ago I said I had peace of mind. Where did that feeling go?
When I finally rolled in around 7:20 there was already a traffic jam exiting the parking lot. Voting took place at the old high school gym and it is a good sized structure, usually sufficient for the task at hand. The place was packed and the line extended outdoors.
In New Hampshire you can register to vote on election day. That line was huge. It might be dangerous to speculate on the composition of these people but I am going to take a couple of educated guesses. I don't think Hillary will bring many new voters to the polls.The unregistered voters were likely either Trumpsters or fraudsters.
Fraudsters like to practice their craft later in the day. They tend to be night owls who wake up when the sun gets warm. They might need a nip or a toke to endure the adversity of standing and waiting and eventually filling in a ballot. The weather is clear but cold today and the brisk air might keep some of them indoors. We will see.
I think the long lines at the registration table were mostly first time voters who came out to vote for Donald Trump. You can sometimes tell at a glance if a person has ever done a day's work and I would say that most of these people are guilty of practicing that age old vice. They might not be employed as we speak but one gets the impression that they would love to tell you all about their new job sometime in the future. Anyone who gets up at dawn and who endures cold temperatures, traffic and long lines to vote can be sorted in the "motivated" file. Draw from these observations whatever conclusion you might. As for me, I don't think they are on hand with the chirping birds to elect our first female president.
Meanwhile, my heart is racing. I am jumpy and a little bit distracted. A few days ago I said I had peace of mind. Where did that feeling go?
The 44 Most Damning Wikileaks
Nice summary from Daily Caller. Not a moment too soon.
I agree with Assange and others that the most disturbing revelation is Hillary's admission that Saudi Arabia and Qatar fund ISIS and it is later revealed that she has taken a boatload of money from both of these countries.
Almost as good was Bill Clinton's leaked speech critical of the Obama Administration's treatment of white working class people.
42 more eyebrow lifters.
I agree with Assange and others that the most disturbing revelation is Hillary's admission that Saudi Arabia and Qatar fund ISIS and it is later revealed that she has taken a boatload of money from both of these countries.
Almost as good was Bill Clinton's leaked speech critical of the Obama Administration's treatment of white working class people.
42 more eyebrow lifters.
Monday, November 7, 2016
Bad Omen For Clinton: Bill Is Heckled BY BLM The Day Before The Election
At least he had an audience. And there were no "Bill Clinton Is A Rapist" placards. But I thought Chelsea married George Soros' nephew.
BTW, the comments at Youtube are not excessively polite (snicker.)
HIS LAST STUMP SPEECH?
BTW, the comments at Youtube are not excessively polite (snicker.)
HIS LAST STUMP SPEECH?
OK, The Podesta To Rice Message Is Not All That Weird
I cut and paste wrong things to wrong places routinely. Looks like this is what Podesta might have done.
Re: Brennan
Yes Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile ----- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:13:25 John, Brennan is interested and thinks he can sign forms. can he proceed as proposed below? **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics – check it out! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir= http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
Goodman, Wikileaks Save The Best For Last
I know I have been going to Goodman a lot lately and I know it is late in the game and minds are made up and in the words of HRC, "At this point, what difference does it make?"
For starters, we find intent to deceive and intent to violate classified information protocol. Yes, we already knew of her intent, but this hammers it home. Comey is exposed as a fraud beyond the blink of a doubt. If Goodman can find intent--and he makes a good case for its occurrence--why can't Inspector Clousseau? How do we say, umm, crooked like zee snake?
I will also check out the pop up ad that appears in correspondence with CIA Director, John Brennan.
THANK YOU, MR. GOODMAN
For starters, we find intent to deceive and intent to violate classified information protocol. Yes, we already knew of her intent, but this hammers it home. Comey is exposed as a fraud beyond the blink of a doubt. If Goodman can find intent--and he makes a good case for its occurrence--why can't Inspector Clousseau? How do we say, umm, crooked like zee snake?
I will also check out the pop up ad that appears in correspondence with CIA Director, John Brennan.
THANK YOU, MR. GOODMAN
H. A. Goodman On DNC 2 From Wikileaks
Goodman relentlessly combs over every email from Wikileaks. It has taken him weeks to peruse and highlight 50,000 Podesta/DNC emails. Of course, speed-reading James Comey read through 650,000 emails in a much shorter time frame. Comey so smart.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Tim Kaine Draws A Crowd
ABOUT 30
About ten days later Kaine's popularity lags a bit. NBC describes "a small line" of 3 people forming outside his event. The line later swelled to 8 but some were suspected of being with the campaign.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/three-people-line-see-tim-kaine-florida-photos/
The only way Hillary can win, is if she steals it.
About ten days later Kaine's popularity lags a bit. NBC describes "a small line" of 3 people forming outside his event. The line later swelled to 8 but some were suspected of being with the campaign.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/three-people-line-see-tim-kaine-florida-photos/
The only way Hillary can win, is if she steals it.
Hillary And Lebron Draw About 300 (And Some Of Them May Have Been Paid)
Cut to about 2:00 to see the crowd size. Alex Jones is the only source I know that challenges the Hillary narrative and gets beyond her close up.
iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mULvVYtoJ7E?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>
iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mULvVYtoJ7E?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>
Wikileaks 32: Clintons Paid For Chelsea's $3M Wedding With Foundation Funds
A couple of days ago we shared a Podesta email from Doug Band about Chelsea talking openly in public about her "internal investigation" into the Clinton Foundation.
As with many of the Doug Band email chains, the rabbit hole just got a little deeper today with Band accusing of Chelsea of "using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade" among other accusations. He also concludes with another veiled threat on the consequences "once we go down this road...."
The Tamera Luzzatto Email Released By Wikileaks
A lot of people have forwarded this one. It could be something innocent. It could be something bogus. It could be someone talking in code. But but but...whoever jurisdiction this happens to fall under had better follow up on this pronto! If there is nothing to see here, please inform those angry peasants ASAP.
IS THAT THE CLATTER OF PITCHFORKS I HEAR?
IS THAT THE CLATTER OF PITCHFORKS I HEAR?
Saturday, November 5, 2016
Peace Of Mind
For about a month I put my life on hold and did Internet research. Blogs, Twitter, Youtube, Wikileaks, DC Leaks, Judicial Watch, Guccifer 2.0, anyone referring to themselves as Anonymous, Alex Jones, the British tabs, the Russian Times...anything beyond the US media "echo chamber" as George Soros himself described his Frankenmedia. I was at times anxious and at other times, depressed. Now I have peace of mind.
I believe that if the elections were on the level, Trump would win by a substantial margin. Of course, Hillary, Soros, the Saudis, et al, will try to steal the outcome and they might succeed. There is the chance that the Never Trumpers might yet tip the scales for the Plutocrats, Still, I have peace of mind.
A post I wanted to write a few months ago never got written but it has been written by the world and the unfolding of events. I was going to pose the question, is the Trump campaign all about Trump or is it part of a larger movement? Recently, I learned that it is the latter. This is an ongoing battle pitting the ruling class and their lackeys against the peasants who choose not to be anyone's boot licker. This clarity contributes to my peace of mind.
Donald J. Trump, my fifth or sixth or seventh favorite presidential candidate, has emerged as a heroic figure of folkloric proportions. I say this as someone who disagrees with building a physical wall, who thinks NAFTA is a good thing, who sees cheap Asian labor as something mutually beneficial to both Asians and Americans and who believes that Americans benefit when the Chinese manipulate their currency. With our stated ongoing disagreements, I recognize that Donald Trump loves America and I believe he will always pursue his country's best interest. Such cannot be said about Hillary Clinton.
Substantively, Donald Trump reminds me of an old time Democrat. Yes, I might have philosophical disagreements with the old time Dems but all in all, they were good people. If we lost an election to them, we lost an election. We did not lose our country. The old time Democrats would not give George Soros or ISIS or Cuba the time of day. Times change and so too did the Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party is hopelessly corrupt and the GOP is almost as bad. Donald Trump has spearheaded a "Drain The Swamp" movement. I cannot think of a more worthy cause.
My peace of mind comes partly from the inspiration of Donald Trump. I have never seen anyone fight like this man. He did not have to weather the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune but he boldly did so. Unlike most people who earn a fortune, he did not turn his back on America, the American people or the system that allowed him to prosper. Unlike the oligarchs, he did not try to saw off the lower rungs on the ladder.
Donald Trump declared the existence of a rigged system but it took Julian Assange and Wikileaks to confirm it beyond a trace of doubt. If you are of the opinion that Assange did not deliver a bombshell, you have not been paying attention. Wikileaks proved among many other things that Obama was complicit in Hillary's espionage, Hillary knowingly and willingly accepted money from ISIS financiers. Hillary is in the pocket of George Soros. The American news media is more corrupt and more complicit and more brazen in advancing a partisan agenda than even the most cynical conspiracy nut could ever fathom. Hillary rigged, yes rigged, the Democratic primaries...and that is just the tip of the sewage iceberg.
Julian Assange confirmed what we knew all along, that we held the moral high ground. That is mostly what gives me peace of mind. Win or lose, we will have done all that we could do and we, the anti-Hillarys, will have done the right thing. Every criticism of Donald Trump is specious, superficial or both. Hillary, on the other hand, provides a fruited plain for the planting of legitimate criticism. For starters, she is a habitual criminal. Unlike Al Capone or John Gotti or Lucky Luciano, Hillary Clinton has committed espionage against America. There is real vice here. Hillary voters will have blood on their hands and they know it.
May God bless Donald Trump!
May God bless Julian Assange!
May God bless everyone who bothers to pay attention and votes accordingly!
There are still heroic figures in this world willing to stake everything on moral principle. That gives me peace of mind.
I believe that if the elections were on the level, Trump would win by a substantial margin. Of course, Hillary, Soros, the Saudis, et al, will try to steal the outcome and they might succeed. There is the chance that the Never Trumpers might yet tip the scales for the Plutocrats, Still, I have peace of mind.
A post I wanted to write a few months ago never got written but it has been written by the world and the unfolding of events. I was going to pose the question, is the Trump campaign all about Trump or is it part of a larger movement? Recently, I learned that it is the latter. This is an ongoing battle pitting the ruling class and their lackeys against the peasants who choose not to be anyone's boot licker. This clarity contributes to my peace of mind.
Donald J. Trump, my fifth or sixth or seventh favorite presidential candidate, has emerged as a heroic figure of folkloric proportions. I say this as someone who disagrees with building a physical wall, who thinks NAFTA is a good thing, who sees cheap Asian labor as something mutually beneficial to both Asians and Americans and who believes that Americans benefit when the Chinese manipulate their currency. With our stated ongoing disagreements, I recognize that Donald Trump loves America and I believe he will always pursue his country's best interest. Such cannot be said about Hillary Clinton.
Substantively, Donald Trump reminds me of an old time Democrat. Yes, I might have philosophical disagreements with the old time Dems but all in all, they were good people. If we lost an election to them, we lost an election. We did not lose our country. The old time Democrats would not give George Soros or ISIS or Cuba the time of day. Times change and so too did the Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party is hopelessly corrupt and the GOP is almost as bad. Donald Trump has spearheaded a "Drain The Swamp" movement. I cannot think of a more worthy cause.
My peace of mind comes partly from the inspiration of Donald Trump. I have never seen anyone fight like this man. He did not have to weather the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune but he boldly did so. Unlike most people who earn a fortune, he did not turn his back on America, the American people or the system that allowed him to prosper. Unlike the oligarchs, he did not try to saw off the lower rungs on the ladder.
Donald Trump declared the existence of a rigged system but it took Julian Assange and Wikileaks to confirm it beyond a trace of doubt. If you are of the opinion that Assange did not deliver a bombshell, you have not been paying attention. Wikileaks proved among many other things that Obama was complicit in Hillary's espionage, Hillary knowingly and willingly accepted money from ISIS financiers. Hillary is in the pocket of George Soros. The American news media is more corrupt and more complicit and more brazen in advancing a partisan agenda than even the most cynical conspiracy nut could ever fathom. Hillary rigged, yes rigged, the Democratic primaries...and that is just the tip of the sewage iceberg.
Julian Assange confirmed what we knew all along, that we held the moral high ground. That is mostly what gives me peace of mind. Win or lose, we will have done all that we could do and we, the anti-Hillarys, will have done the right thing. Every criticism of Donald Trump is specious, superficial or both. Hillary, on the other hand, provides a fruited plain for the planting of legitimate criticism. For starters, she is a habitual criminal. Unlike Al Capone or John Gotti or Lucky Luciano, Hillary Clinton has committed espionage against America. There is real vice here. Hillary voters will have blood on their hands and they know it.
May God bless Donald Trump!
May God bless Julian Assange!
May God bless everyone who bothers to pay attention and votes accordingly!
There are still heroic figures in this world willing to stake everything on moral principle. That gives me peace of mind.
Assange Takes Time To Spell Out The Obvious For The Remedials
Talking to a friend on Friday who will be voting for Gary Johnson, he said something about waiting on Assange to deliver a bombshell. My jaw dropped and I stammered a bit and what I meant to say but did not say was "How many bombshells do you need?"
The case against Hillary Clinton is airtight. As Assange points out, the most significant email is the candid admission that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are supporting ISIS. It is extremely well established that the Clinton Foundation has taken tens of millions of dollars from the financiers of ISIS! And folks, that is the tip of the iceberg.
Assange's political analysis is spot on, especially his comments about the enemies of Donald Trump. I realize that bloggers preach to the choir but please, please, spread this interview.
""TRUMP WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO WIN'
The case against Hillary Clinton is airtight. As Assange points out, the most significant email is the candid admission that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are supporting ISIS. It is extremely well established that the Clinton Foundation has taken tens of millions of dollars from the financiers of ISIS! And folks, that is the tip of the iceberg.
Assange's political analysis is spot on, especially his comments about the enemies of Donald Trump. I realize that bloggers preach to the choir but please, please, spread this interview.
""TRUMP WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO WIN'
Friday, November 4, 2016
Pollsters Donate Overwhelmingly To Democrats
Like their crooked cousins in the journalism trade, pollsters support Democrats and Democratic candidates by a wide margin:
Federal Election Commission campaign-finance records show that top-level executives at some polling firms conducting presidential polls for major news agencies have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democratic Party and to Hillary Clinton’s campaign in this election cycle. The volume and dollar amount of these contributions appear to vastly outweigh contributions made to Republicans and the Trump campaign. Numbers given here are approximinate
NBC/Survey Monkey
A search of FEC records shows that Survey Monkey employees have given $646,000– or approximately 96 percent of all their contributions – to Democratic Party candidates, committees and causes since 2004. They contributed $27,500 to Republican candidates, committees and causes over that same period of time.
The Good News Is That Assange Is Alive And Well
Here is a sneak preview of John Pilger's Julian Assange interview.
https://www.facebook.com/RTvids/videos/1360140427329540/
H. A. Goodman Addresses Clinton Child Abduction Innuendo
I for one am more disturbed with the Gulf State funding of CGI, Huma Abedin's family ties, ongoing pay for play with nefarious characters, White House involvement in espionage, the whole damn world gaining access to our defense secrets due to Hillary's recklessness, the successful effort turn the news media into an "echo chamber" to name but a few recent revelations.
There might be something there with Hillary and human trafficking but the dots are not yet connected and do we really need to give them something that could be dismissed as a shotgun allegation? I wish Wikileaks would have released some of this much earlier.
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Is This The Wikileaks Bombshell?
I don't put much past HRC but human trafficking seems a bit extreme, especially for someone who is so accomplished at other, safer, methods of revenue-generation.
There are a lot of loose ends here. I wish I could spend all day connecting the dots but unfortunately, that is not the case.
Check it out:
There are a lot of loose ends here. I wish I could spend all day connecting the dots but unfortunately, that is not the case.
Check it out:
If Hillary Is Not Indicted BEFORE The Election, The System Is Hopelessly Rigged
You can hear the pundits and the thugs and zombies whine about the timing of the arrest right before election day. Yes, but Clinton and her co-conspirators should have been indicted last July, if not sooner. We recently learned that the FBI had Abedin's loaded laptop for three weeks. Why did they not immediately kick start the wheels of justice? Clearly, the FBI wanted to help Hillary run out the clock.
Clinton should have been indicted in July, if not sooner. She certainly should have been indicted before the Democrat convention. Nonetheless, there has been ample time to correct a grievous series of wrongs. Once more, Crooked Comey aided and abetted in the cover-up. If he can get Hillary elected, Obama can pardon her and America is safe for plutocracy.
Are you as corrupt as you look, Director Comey? The next few days will tell.
Clinton should have been indicted in July, if not sooner. She certainly should have been indicted before the Democrat convention. Nonetheless, there has been ample time to correct a grievous series of wrongs. Once more, Crooked Comey aided and abetted in the cover-up. If he can get Hillary elected, Obama can pardon her and America is safe for plutocracy.
Are you as corrupt as you look, Director Comey? The next few days will tell.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)