Power To The People! Soros Thugs Defeated In Berkely

THE PEASANTS FIGHT BACK

And btw, the Mayor of Berkeley belongs to a radical group called By Any Means Necessary.

Looks Like That Right Wing Conspiracy Is Even More Vast Than We Thought It Was

I have called Robert Reich a compulsive liar in the past. In fairness, he might be more delusional than dishonest. Whatever the case, he speaks falsely.

If you are playing that drinking game where you watch CNN and chug-a-lug every time you hear an obvious bearing of false witness, Reich will send you into a coma. Try counting his many lies and smears in just this one brief appearance.

Reich calls Trump and Bannon "bomb throwers". Ironic, as Soros's henchmen fit that term literally. Or as fake news outlets describe the activity, "the protesters set off fireworks". Bet they sold cotton candy too.

I wish Bannon and Milo would sue CNN and their lackeys for character assassination.




HOW DOST THOU DECEIVE ME? LET ME COUNT THE WAYS

The Russians Hacked The Election (Insert Laugh Track Here)

I am starting to believe there might be something to that post-modernism after all. The purveyors of fake news create a fake news witch hunt while promoting a fake news bonanza stating that "the Russians hacked the election."

The silly ass meme could be halted with one question: "Specifically, what constitutes election hacking?"

Even if the worst accusations against (that are not all that grievous) were proven to be true, that the Russkies used advanced cyber technology to gain access to Podesta's emails and then handed them over to Julian Assange--Assange denies any Russian connection--does this mean that we should sanction or punish foreign nationals who have aided and abetted the Democrats?

Citizen of the World-At-Large, George Soros, has interfered in American elections for three decades. In 2016 he extended his scope to successfully influence local races. Do his actions constitute election hacking?

Carlos Slim, a Mexican national who at various times has been listed as the wealthiest man on Planet Earth, is rabidly anti-Trump. In 2015 he became the largest single investor in "The New York Times." Ironically (said with a hint of irony) it was this esteemed purveyor of fake news that illegally procured Donald Trump's tax records in the 2016 presidential election season. Does this illegality constitute election hacking?

Does the slanted reporting of foreign news entities, like BBC, Al Jazeera, Russia Times constitute election hacking? Regarding Russia Times, does anyone care to make the point that they have promoted a pro-Trump agenda? Good luck squaring that circle.

This from Ricochet.

The media is intentionally lying to the public because they want a better excuse for Election Day than the reality. They would rather focus on hacking, the popular vote, FBI Director James Comey, or the minuscule alt-right, instead of accepting that American voters slightly preferred Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, at least in the states where it counted. People wanted change over the ineptness, cronyism, and stagnation of the Obama era. They didn’t trust the utterly untrustable Clinton and liked her even less.

Soros Bribes, Er, Persuades Obama To Dump Refugees On America

TEL AVIV – Hacked documents from George Soros’s Open Society Institute state that the billionaire and his foundation helped to successfully press the Obama administration into increasing to 100,000 the total number of refugees taken in by the U.S. annually, Breitbart Jerusalem has found.

The documents reveal that the billionaire personally sent President Obama a letter on the issue of accepting refugees.




The hacked memo also shows that the billionaire’s foundation pressed the U.S. government to enact two other major policy objectives regarding the intake of Syrian refugees. A timeline demonstrates that at last one of those policies – providing more financing to overseas refugee efforts – was indeed implemented by the Obama administration, while it isn’t clear whether the administration was reacting directly to the Soros group’s campaign in that case.

Full story at Breitbart.

Sanders's High Water Mark

This blogger correctly predicted a big day for Trump last Tuesday due in part to the Chicago riot coordinated by forces close to and sympathetic to Bernie Sanders. When the three remaining GOP candidates blamed Trump's harsh language for the attack, I knew it was game, set, match.

The Trump people are largely decent folk (I hate using that term post-Obama but we can't just abandon innocent words.) This might not be the opinion of pundits, political insiders and the intelligentsia but it is pretty much the perspective of Main Street. I could see Rubio, Cruz and Kasich backsliding but I did not foresee Sanders losing five of five primaries including a landslide in Florida..

Sanders's pinnacle was hours before the Chicago riot. He unleashed his Brown Shirts and the Dems said, "Hello Hillary." If Soros wants to defeat Trump, he might reconsider his tactics. Thuggery will not work better for Hillary than for Sanders.

Bye bye Bernie. Can't say we will miss you.

Obama's Political High Water Mark

The most underrated TV show in history might be "SCTV." One of the best story lines is when network owner Guy Caballero creates his own awards show and then rigs the outcomes. SCTV third bananas beat show biz luminaries for every award. When SCTV cleaning lady, Perini Scleroso, is given The Best Foreign Personality Award, Caballero (Joe Flaherty) realizes he has overplayed his hand.

Life imitates art. David Axelrod is Guy Caballero and Barack Obama is Perini Scleroso. For reasons never well articulated, Barack Obama was declared the Nobel Peace Prize winner on October 9, 2009.

If the Scleroso comparison sounds too harsh, let us remind ourselves that the Peace Prize nominations were sealed twelve days after Obama's inauguration. Twelve days of briefings and photo ops and unpacking moving crates. Perhaps Soros and the Ax Man should have waited a year before performing their magic trick.

The Kool-Aiders cannot understand the fuss. What's wrong with recognizing Barack's divine essence? Actions are overrated. Fundamentalism can be mighty ugly.

But not everyone who voted for the O Man is a fundamentalist. Some of his supporters were independents who for some reason thought that Obama was smart and untarnished by a dirty system. When Obama was awarded the coveted Nobel Prize, a lot of independent voters re-examined their choice.

If the Peacemaker did not deserve his latest honor, did he deserve the presidency? Was it possible that he received some preferential treatment in that contest as well? Could it be that Obama was all hype and millions were played as suckers? A lot of people quietly asked themselves that question. Without the Peace Prize, they might not have introspected.

October 9, 2009 might be Obama's political high water mark. Maybe if the puppeteers had waited a year or two, or three, the maneuver would have been perceived differently. But the smart guys did indeed overplay their hand. And as they say, the rest is history.

THE PEOPLE'S GLOBAL GOLDEN CHOICE AWARDS

Is George Soros Behind The Ongoing Attacks On Peter Schiff?

Wonder what George Soros' Open Society Funds? Here is a nice overview.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

Certain characteristics run through Soros' creations like thread through a tapestry.

1. Astroturf surface: Open Society does want to reveal itself as an 800 pound octopus. They fund smaller organizations that try real, real hard to look like a warm and cuddly grass roots organization.

2. Routine misinformation. We examined the Robert Reich falsehoods advanced by moveon.org in a previous post. That is par for the course with most things Soros.

3. A high degree of personal attacks, insults and character assassination. The Left applies the Alinsky Model routinely because the facts are rarely on their side. Thus, they cannot argue substance. Attack. Attack. Attack. Truth be damned.

Do the ongoing series of attacks on Peter Schiff lead back to George Soros? I don't know. There is no smoking gun but there is definitely some astroturf getting installed. The following youtube site is called the SchittReport in honor of TheSchiffReport.

http://www.youtube.com/user/SchittReport#p/u

The site posts dozens upon dozens of videos bashing Peter Schiff. Under "Other Channels" they list SchiffNemesis that has uploaded 10 videos. They also list AntiSchiff, a channel with 120 uploads and "The Schitt Report Too" that has uploaded 60 videos.

The channels pretend to be run by individuals but this seems to be a group effort. A lot of similar "style" is consistent throughout the channels. Their collective output suggests a group effort. Most lefties are, what is the right term? Willfully blind? Deliberately ignorant? Most of the OWS crowd have no idea who Peter Schiff is and they don't care to be enlightened.

It is suspicious that unrelated individuals who have no political agenda comb through every word of Peter Schiff, as well as every word of anyone who disagrees with Peter Schiff, spend a hell of a lot of time splicing and producing youtube videos loaded with off the shelf insults that do not necessarily fit the subject at hand and they do it all for recreational purposes. Something is wrong with the picture.