The Dominion vs. Fox News lawsuit was fishy from day 1.
Why would Dominion file suit knowing that in the process of discovery, it would be revealed that Dominion had doubts about the security of their voting machines?
Why would Dominion sue Fox News after Fox immediately fired the only correspondent who broached the subject of election fraud?
Why would Fox settle their suit when internal texts reveal that their marquee talkers badmouthed Sidney Powell and others who advanced the very premise of election fraud? If anything, Fox News went above and beyond to shield Dominion. The most embarrassing aspects of the case for Fox News is the low regard they have for their viewers and their willingness to turn a blind eye to ALL evidence of election irregularities.
We have linked elsewhere to a post that also questions the numbers. Fox News "settled" for somewhere between 4x and 40x the value of Dominion Voting Systems?
If I were a Fox News stockholder, I would talk to someone knowledgeable about legal malpractice as well as management's failure to uphold fiduciary responsibility. But of course, I am not a Fox News stockholder. Fox News sucks.
No comments:
Post a Comment