Long video but to summarize:
TRUMP WINS
Saturday, November 28, 2020
Jerome Corsi on How Trump Became President
This video is probably vintage 2018. I accept the premise that two deep state factions vie for power. One is loosely formed around the CIA and the other group stems from the DIA.
The two factions are divided culturally and ideologically. The CIA faction is global in focus and the DIA faction holds an America-first perspective.
This explains why there is such an intense and pervasive and prolonged attack on Donald Trump. Do you really think they hate Trump because he Tweets or because he has orange hair or an insufficient number of celebrity friends? Do you really think they would be spending billions to get rid of Trump because he is crass and crude and gauche? The world doe not work that way.
You don't sign George Stephanopolous to a nine-figure salary because of his oratory skills. Millions, literally millions of English-speaking citizens could perform his stated job as well as Georgie Boy. And it's not like the eight figures a year bring ratings. This is serious cash paid by serious people who want results.
Because I believe the set of conspiracies Corsi promotes are extremely plausible, I believe that Trump will prevail. This is not a game. If generals were serious enough to plot a coup against Obama, they are not about to hand the country over to Cheating Joe.
You get caught cheating on a scale previously unimaginable and you think the Michael Flynn types are just going to shrug and shake your hand? Have fun with your dark winter and global reset and nuclear Iran and we'll all sing kumbaya at your inauguration, Joe. This is not a game.
It might seem like Trump is vulnerable but rest assured, he has friends in high places.
On a side note, InfoWars has once assembled the most colorful menagerie of characters on the Internet. Led by Alex Jones, they had Paul Joseph Watson, Corsi, Roger Stone, Millie Weaver, and Steve Pieczenik to name but a few correspondents. Reminds one of the Greenwich Village golden age when Bob Dylan would follow Tiny Tim and Richard Pryor and Joan Rivers provided the laughs. Camelots never seem to last very long.
Thoughts on The Kinetic Civil War
Civil War is here. It has been here but many of us refuse to see it. If the Associated Press does not call it...
This is called negative hallucination. We overlook what is plain to see. The lawfare waged against Michael Flynn, the shooting of Steve Scalise (where many other Republicans were targeted), the suspicious crash of a train loaded with GOP operatives on January 31, 2018, the burning of Minneapolis, multiple church arsons. One might see a pattern here.
Our first Civil War officially lasted four years, 1861 to 1865. Unofficially, it lasted about twenty years. The 1850s was a decade marked by civil conflict between proslavery and abolitionist forces. Bleeding Kansas earned this moniker for a reason but the Hawkeye State did not hold a monopoly on mayhem. In what was then Virginia, John Brown and two of his sons were hanged after capturing a federal armory and attempting to lead a slave insurrection. In retrospect, the official war was a long time coming.
Despite the sobering carnage and the economic ruin inflicted on the South, civil insurrections followed the stillness at Appomattox. The Ku Klux Klan was formed in 1865 and it was not long before they became famous for doing what Klansmen do. Historians like to write about the big war, of course, but President Grant did a masterful if unsung job of stopping insurrections before they resulted in a second Civil War.
Some grudges never died but 1876 marked an end to an era. Former Union General, Rutherford B. Hayes, won a corrupted election and his presidency was on shaky ground. He appeased the antebellum South and paved the way for segregation and what would become known as Jim Crow laws. Peace came at a price but the Civil War era had concluded.
Wars sometimes feature a long introduction and an even longer epilog. Civil wars, even more so.
The following tweet appeared on November 20th.
The Daily Dot tells us that this was a prank and we were fooled again.
In keeping with my gullibility, I believe that Antifa does exist and that they are to the new Democrat Party what the KKK was to yesterday's Democrats.
The "prankster" mentioned a tactic that has already been floated by the Anti-Democrats. Recall a previous post concerning a trucker strike to support Donald Trump. It was planned for now--more specifically November 26 to November 29.
Bold of them to plan a strike on a four day weekend, long after the Black Friday cargo had been delivered, followed by a high travel weekend that has traditionally been a calm before the holidays. The halfhearted strike was proposed before the many revelations of voter fraud throughout the country. The next strike might be more serious.
When the war goes hot, supply lines will be cut. Unlike Antifa and their wholesale destruction, the Other Side will fight strategically. Antifa does not have the clout to cut off food, water, gas, electricity, etc., to strategic areas. The Other Side does.
We are a long way from national unity.
I CONCUR
Friday, November 27, 2020
This Case Has Already Been Decided In The Court of Analytics
We further find that if these updates were only more extreme than 99% of all updates nationally in terms of their deviation from this generally-observed pattern, that, holding all else equal, Joe Biden may very well have lost the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and that he would have 42 fewer Electoral votes — putting Biden below the number required to win the Presidency. Either way, it is indisputable that his margin of victory in these three states relies on four most anomalous vote updates identified by the metric developed in this report.
We once again note that this analysis is largely restricted to four individual vote updates out of a sample of nearly 9,000. This report by no means suggests stopping investigations in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, or elsewhere; it is merely that these four key ballot updates are both profoundly anomalous with respect to a metric which removes any component of different states having different partisan leanings or a different number of voters. Furthermore, this analysis does not require that we regard the final vote totals in any of these states (or counties thereof) as suspicious, nor, critically, does it require that we accept that the observed data should follow any particular distribution a priori. We merely show that the data, adjusted appropriately to remove differences in size and political leaning between states, does follow a certain pattern, and that four key vote updates deviate profoundly from that pattern.
It is our belief that the extraordinarily anomalous nature of the studied vote updates here, combined with the staggering political implications, demands immediate and thorough investigation.
FULL ARTICLE from votepatternanalysis.substack.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)