(Alexandria, VA) – August 27. The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) has put 141 counties on notice across the United States that they have more registered voters than people alive. PILF has sent 141 statutory notice letters to county election officials in 21 states. The letters are a prerequisite to bringing a lawsuit against those counties under Section 8 of the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The letters inform the target counties that it appears they are violating the NVRA because they are not properly maintaining the voter rolls. The NVRA, (also known as Motor Voter) requires state and local election officials to properly maintain voter rolls and ensure that only eligible voters are registered to vote. Having more registrants than eligible citizens alive indicates that election officials have failed to properly maintain voter rolls.
States with counties which received a notice letter are (# of counties): Michigan (24), Kentucky (18), Illinois (17), Indiana (11), Alabama (10), Colorado (10), Texas (9), Nebraska (7), New Mexico (5), South Dakota (5), Kansas (4), Mississippi (4), Louisiana (3), West Virginia (3), Georgia (2), Iowa (2), Montana (2), North Carolina (2), Arizona, Missouri, New York (1 each). Federally produced data show the letter recipients have more registrants than living eligible citizens alive.
Rest of story.
Remember, there is no such thing as voter fraud.
Media Elitism, The Death of Journalism, Media Bias, Voter Fraud, Destructive Economics and other things Obama
Thursday, August 27, 2015
Saturday, August 22, 2015
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
How To Trump Trump
Politics seems simple to outsiders like me. Who doesn't think they cannot possibly screw up a campaign as badly as a Schmidt or a Rove or a Sununu? Things that seem obvious often seem obvious because they are obvious.
Here are a few things that seem loudly obvious:
1. Red meat is popular.
2. To appeal to a red meat crowd...serve...red...meat. No quiche. No watery stew. No meat substitutes or products designed to look and taste like beef. Serve...red...meat.
3. If someone monopolizes the grill, get your own damn grill and start handing out fatter and juicier and tastier steaks and chops and burgers.
I heard Pam Gellar on the radio yesterday and she voiced her frustration with anti-jihad inertia. She sounds a lot like Ann Coulter discussing immigration. It's not just the Obama Administration who is allergic to truth. It's not just the Democrats who are addicted to euphemism. We are under attack and no one wants to acknowledge it.
Ann Coulter found her knight in shining armor in the form of Donald Trump. Pam Gellar is still the bridesmaid. Should a Republican page wish to earn his blade and mount, simply identify and denounce and attack jihad. Terrorism has a larger built-in audience than immigration.
One problem with stating the obvious is that no one will pay you for your advice. Consultants are paid to muffle Sarah Palin and to take Benghazi off the table and to attack Tea Party members. Meanwhile, Donald Trump speaks loud and clear and leaves the entire political class scratching their heads. Anyone else want to serve up a few burgers?
Here are a few things that seem loudly obvious:
1. Red meat is popular.
2. To appeal to a red meat crowd...serve...red...meat. No quiche. No watery stew. No meat substitutes or products designed to look and taste like beef. Serve...red...meat.
3. If someone monopolizes the grill, get your own damn grill and start handing out fatter and juicier and tastier steaks and chops and burgers.
I heard Pam Gellar on the radio yesterday and she voiced her frustration with anti-jihad inertia. She sounds a lot like Ann Coulter discussing immigration. It's not just the Obama Administration who is allergic to truth. It's not just the Democrats who are addicted to euphemism. We are under attack and no one wants to acknowledge it.
Ann Coulter found her knight in shining armor in the form of Donald Trump. Pam Gellar is still the bridesmaid. Should a Republican page wish to earn his blade and mount, simply identify and denounce and attack jihad. Terrorism has a larger built-in audience than immigration.
One problem with stating the obvious is that no one will pay you for your advice. Consultants are paid to muffle Sarah Palin and to take Benghazi off the table and to attack Tea Party members. Meanwhile, Donald Trump speaks loud and clear and leaves the entire political class scratching their heads. Anyone else want to serve up a few burgers?
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Strong Dollar vs Weak Dollar?
I believe strongly in a strong dollar. A strong dollar benefits everyone who saves dollars, who is paid in dollars or who spends dollars. A weak dollar benefits holders of rival currencies, debtors and niche players. Arguably, debtors and most niche players might also benefit long-term from a strong dollar.
An example of a niche player is a Manhattan hotel who caters to Chinese tourists. If the Chinese devalue the yuan the hotel might see a sudden decline in guests. In my view they are being short-sighted. Their assets have held value, especially against the yuan. They also have a new potential market, holders of American dollars whose purchasing power has also held its ground.
Exporters can also be short-sighted. Devalue the home currency and foreigners suddenly see your product more attractively. That is because your product has lost value with the home currency devaluation. The exporter's assets and savings are devalued along with the native currency. The number guys sometimes overlook those details.
Larry Kudlow used to be on CNBC and he would tout King Dollar. Now CNBC is staffed by talking heads who whine about the evils of a strong dollar. Donald Trump complains about the Chinese "manipulating" their currency. Fox News will periodically voice similar complaints.
I say, let them manipulate. If we can assist them in this endeavor, let us do so. I will admit a certain bias here. When I hear anyone sell the advantages of a weaker native currency I think FLIMFLAM! It is the trickery that is at the root of our country's economic decline.
The strong dollar people, few in number and small in influence, have not sold the merits of a stable currency to the public. Perhaps the most important question will go unasked by the millionaire pundits: "Mr. Candidate, do you prefer a strong dollar or a weak dollar?"
An example of a niche player is a Manhattan hotel who caters to Chinese tourists. If the Chinese devalue the yuan the hotel might see a sudden decline in guests. In my view they are being short-sighted. Their assets have held value, especially against the yuan. They also have a new potential market, holders of American dollars whose purchasing power has also held its ground.
Exporters can also be short-sighted. Devalue the home currency and foreigners suddenly see your product more attractively. That is because your product has lost value with the home currency devaluation. The exporter's assets and savings are devalued along with the native currency. The number guys sometimes overlook those details.
Larry Kudlow used to be on CNBC and he would tout King Dollar. Now CNBC is staffed by talking heads who whine about the evils of a strong dollar. Donald Trump complains about the Chinese "manipulating" their currency. Fox News will periodically voice similar complaints.
I say, let them manipulate. If we can assist them in this endeavor, let us do so. I will admit a certain bias here. When I hear anyone sell the advantages of a weaker native currency I think FLIMFLAM! It is the trickery that is at the root of our country's economic decline.
The strong dollar people, few in number and small in influence, have not sold the merits of a stable currency to the public. Perhaps the most important question will go unasked by the millionaire pundits: "Mr. Candidate, do you prefer a strong dollar or a weak dollar?"
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Monday, August 10, 2015
China Has Been Reading White House Email since 2010
China's cyber spies have accessed the private emails of "many" top Obama administration officials, according to a senior U.S. intelligence official and a top secret document obtained by NBC News, and have been doing so since at least April 2010.
The email grab -- first codenamed "Dancing Panda" by U.S. officials, and then "Legion Amethyst" -- was detected in April 2010, according to a top secret NSA briefing from 2014. The intrusion into personal emails was still active at the time of the briefing and, according to the senior official, is still going on.
Cruz, Fiorina and Yes, Donald Trump Were Winners In Last Week's Debate.
An NBC/Survey Monkey weekend poll reveals that Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina picked up substantial ground and Trump picked up a point (So much for Luntz's negative assessment). Ben Carson also did well. Christie lost two points and both Bush and Walker lost three.
All other candidates were unchanged or has a loss or gain equal to 1.
All other candidates were unchanged or has a loss or gain equal to 1.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
