This site has steered clear of election polls and pundits. If we learned anything from 2020 is that it is difficult, if not impossible, to gauge the impact of election fraud. Election fraud is the independent variable. Know the value of x--and I don't know of anyone who is sharing the value of x with the general public--and you will know the outcome of the midterms.
This site is not necessarily concerned about the relative accuracy of the many pollsters who occupy other site's attention. Is Trafalgar more accurate than Rasmussen? Moot. Is Red Eagle Politics accurate in his projections? Irrelevant. How scientific are political scientists? About as scientific as the cross-dressing Surgeon General renouncing his Y-chromosome.
The alert citizenry was blindsided by the scale and scope of election fraud in 2020. Patrick Byrne, a man who this writer respects greatly would deliver the worst analogy in the history of analogies when he compared the Bidenistas to baseball players who used steroids. Swing and a miss, Sir Patrick. Think of the 2020 election as a field of nightmares wherein the Black Sox paid off the umpires, the official scorer, the scoreboard operator, the press corps, the enhanced security team, the grounds crew and, the official team doctors, as they mandated the concessionaires serve up poisons to the homefield crowd. To paraphrase "Time" the final score was fortified.
If there was zero cheating, we would witness the Republicans winning both houses of Congress as well as every state house and governor's mansion that is in contention. Then again, if there was zero cheating Donald Trump would still be in office, gas would be under $2/gallon, the stock market would have gone north, we would not be funneling money to a corrupt and tyrannical Ukrainian thug, and we would not be calculating heat or eat tradeoffs.
We will not be watching election coverage to find out how people voted. We already have a good idea how that would turn out. We will nervously monitor our screens to find out how much, and how obvious, and how effective.
Election fraud is the story of the day. It might be the only story of the day. Election fraud might be the story of every day hereafter.
So look over here at the big bad number, lol.
Can someone please explain to me how we got here?
This was a damages hearing, all well and good. But what process that brought us to this phase?
What I know is they started with the discovery phase and the court demanded evidence that Defense said didn’t exist.
I know more documents were turned over during discovery, by the Defense, then any other normal american has ever turned over, by a lot.
I know the judge defaulted the Defense on its “refusal to turn over” evidence.
I am pretty sure there were motions to got to trial by the defense as well.
How do they skip the trial phase?
Or how did it move past that?
I have seen Alex all over tv saying he was denied that but nobody makes that the question to be answered?
Everyone wants to talk about free speech and make that the story when to me it looks like our right to trial by jury was stripped away.
This is where im lost and need some explaining if anyone can.
Its too bad alt media picked up the story about the big number and then act like they didn’t pay attention the the trial, lmao.. what trial…
The manor in which he was proven guilty of defamation and allowed to move on to damages is what i need answered.