Saturday, September 1, 2012

Proactive Spin: Why The Obamamedia Inflate Their Leader's Poll Numbers

Obama might get re-elected but that's not the way things are trending. The tea leaves look bad for the O'Man and the media realize it. There has been chatter on the leftist blogs advocating throwing the president under the Greyhound. Blame his defeat on Obama's ineptitude and spare his collectivist worldview. In other words, he had great ideas but he was too (what is the NPR word for stupid ally?) inexperienced/unpolished/ blah blah blah to make it work.

That is one spin. Another spin is in the works. Throughout primary season Romney could only spend a fraction of what Obama was spending. That changes post-convention. Get ready for wall to wall Mitt.

And should Mitt win? "Obama was in the lead until the Citizens United decision blossomed in the real world. Romney bought the election."

The advantage of padding Obama's numbers in June or July is that one cannot be disproven. A perfect media crime.

If the race card flops in focus groups (and it will) it will be replaced by a new meme: Romney bought the election.

2 comments:

Hoosierman said...

Talk about inflated polls. After Quinnipiac found Linda McMahon leading Murphy PPP did a poll putting Murphy ahead. It was + 21 Democrat. Obama is going to lose Connecticut.

Tea Party at Perrysburg said...

I like how the press whines about Obama having only one super pac, "except for the unions," like that's small change. They're trying to make it look like he's vastly out resourced when the truth is he's spending his campaign cash almost (but not quite) as foolishly as he spends taxpayer dollars.

That said, did you see the rumor that Obama's folks are negotiating to buy a move-in in January mansion in Hawaii?